|
From: <rin...@me...> - 2001-11-13 08:06:51
|
> If I remember correctly that's what I proposed some time ago > so I am more > than happy with that :-). I would even go as far as : > > core (contains mock core library) > j2se (contains j2se mocks) > j2ee (contains j2ee mocks) > extensions (contains other "exotic" libraries) > > That we deliver as mo-java-core.jar, mo-java-j2se.jar, > mo-java-j2ee.jar and > mo-java-extensions.jar I fully agree. I sometimes have a fight here in the office with people that want to put everything in one jar without thinking about dependencies. Your proposed split-up clearly identifies this dependencies. Core - If you want to use the mock JUnit extension j2se - Mock objects if you have the standard JDK j2ee - Mock objects if you have the enterprise JDK My vote: +1 Ringo |