Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] Why 'vaj' and 'visualage' in extensions dir + others

[Vincent M. <vm...@oc...>]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Freeman" <st...@m3...>
To: <moc...@li...>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Mockobjects-java-dev] Why 'vaj' and 'visualage' in extensions
dir + others


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Vincent Massol" <vm...@oc...>
> To: <moc...@li...>
> Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 3:21 PM
> Subject: [Mockobjects-java-dev] Why 'vaj' and 'visualage' in extensions
dir
> + others
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > 1/ Why is there 2 directories : 'vaj' and 'visualage' in the extensions
> > directory ?
>
> History. Haven't had the time to merge them.

I have added it as a task in the todo.

>
> > 2/ What is eziba ?
>
> A stub JDBC library. It's a nice job and I would
> like to support it.

How is it going to fit with the SQL mock implementation ? Is it doing the
same ? Why the name 'eziba' ? What do you mean to support it : is it
maintained by someone else, if so where ? Here ? When you're going to write
a tutorial for JDBC testing how is it going to fit as compared with the SQL
mock impl. ? Is it an alternative ?

>
> > 3/ Do we want to generate a separate jar file per extension, like one
for
> > atg, one for visualage, one for eziba, ... ? My answer would be yes and
it
> > seems it is the approach currently followed as proved by the released
> > packages on SF
> >
>
> Yes. We may not be able to build them all because
> of dependencies on libraries that we don't have
> handy.
>

ok fine.

> Steve
-Vincent