Re: [Mixmaster-devel] freebsd port
Brought to you by:
weaselp
From: Jon A. <jam...@ja...> - 2004-03-31 19:12:07
|
Thanks for the feedback Peter. As you can see I decided to sign up for the= list. :) I went with 2.9.1 because I was under the impression that it was the 'stabl= e' version, and decided to make the port after I already had it working. T= his is also the first port that I've ever tried to create for Freebsd so I = think that unless the fixes are really serious issues I'll submit 2.9.1, an= d then try to do 3.0b1. How does that sound? On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 03:44:03PM +0200, Peter Palfrader wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2004, Jon Amundsen wrote: >=20 > > I have not seen any evidence of a freebsd port of mixmaster-2.9.1 . > > So I took some time today after installing to create one. I'm getting > > ready to submit it, but wanted to check here first to see if there > > were any objections, or comments. >=20 > I would use 3.0b1 rather than 2.9.1. It has several bugfixes and > enhancements. >=20 > Peter > --=20 > PGP signed and encrypted | .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** > messages preferred. | : :' : The universal > | `. `' Operating System > http://www.palfrader.org/ | `- http://www.debian.org/ --=20 Jon Amundsen jam...@ja... A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Gandhi |