Re: [mh] Can't scan PLM link table

[Kevin R. K. <ke...@kr...>]

Chris found this bug also, added as issue #170.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 9:04 PM, Eloy Paris <pe...@ch...> wrote:

> On 04/24/2013 10:18 PM, Eloy Paris wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > MH thinks that my PLM link table is corrupt:
> >
> > 04/24/13 10:12:49 PM Running: PLM log links
> > 04/24/13 10:12:49 PM [Insteon::ALDB_PLM] Link table health: corrupt
> > 04/24/13 10:12:49 PM [Insteon::ALDB_PLM] responder record to
> > $kitchen_motion(01) (d1=00, d2=00, d3=00)
> >
> > So I try to refresh the MH link table by running "scan link table" for
> > the PLM. But I get this:
> >
> > 04/24/13 10:13:13 PM Running: PLM scan link table
> > 04/24/13 10:13:13 PM [Insteon_PLM] DEBUG2: Sending obj=$PLM;
> > interface_data= incurred delay of 0.00 seconds; starting hop-count: ?
> > 04/24/13 10:13:13 PM [Insteon_PLM] DEBUG2: ALL-Link Record
> > Response:a201141b33000000
> > 04/24/13 10:13:13 PM [Insteon_PLM] DEBUG2: Sending obj=$PLM;
> > interface_data= incurred delay of 0.10 seconds; starting hop-count: ?
> > 04/24/13 10:13:13 PM [Insteon_PLM]: ERROR!! Command sent to PLM 026a is
> > of an incorrect length.  Message not sent.
> >
> > I tried with both master and Michael's merged i2_aldb_support and got
> > the same result. Seems like the same problem reported here, which I
> > don't see has been solved:
> >
> >
> http://misterhouse.10964.n7.nabble.com/Unable-to-Scan-Links-on-Insteon-PLM-incorrect-length-td17694.html
> >
> > Any ideas?
>
> Backing out commit f256bfb9c0b2ed26bab458447d7799eb4f1f2f2e allows me to
> scan link tables again. Otherwise I get the error above and all my link
> tables get invalidated.
>
> I tried in both master and merged_i2_aldb_support, and with the
> exception of unsuccessful scan of an I2CS device when running master,
> everything worked fine (with the above commit backed out).
>
> Kevin, does link table scanning work for you with the above commit? If
> so, any ideas what could cause my scans to fail with the above commit?
>
> On an unrelated note, it's very nice to see how much more efficient the
> link table scanning code is in merged_i2_aldb_support, i.e.
> read_write_aldb versus the set_address_msb/peek in master.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Eloy Paris.-
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
> New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service
> that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
> browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
> and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_apr
> ________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to:
> http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=1365
>
>