From: Michael S. <mi...@st...> - 2013-03-23 03:45:48
|
On Mar 22, 2013 8:35 PM Neil wrote, > >On 03/22/2013 07:04 PM, Brent DeShazer wrote: >>> I agree with the general sentiment, but to be honest, I'd be happy for my mh >>> install to send a list of all modules/hardware being used. >>> It's a good way to help the developers know what's being used, who might >>> break if you remove X, and so forth. >>> >>> For people who oppose, there should be an easy way to just that off. >> >> How about, "For people who want this, there should be an easy way to just turn it on." >> >> Privacy should be opt-in, not opt-out. > >Agreed, one of the problems with things today that seem innocent is that >tomorrow something happens and the change is not what you'd expect. > >An extreme example to make a point: > >How many times has your private data from an honest site suddenly been >gobbled up when a for-profit company that buys the web property. Then you >find out they're treating your private data as something they suddenly >own? The good news is that I removed the analytics tracking from the documentation table of contents. Unless a developer steps up to write some code, we will not need to worry about opt-in or opt-out :) |