From: Lieven H. <li...@li...> - 2012-12-15 16:35:59
|
Hello Michael, another topic to bring up next to the suggestion to switch the version control to git: together with the git repo there is a wiki available too. The nice thing is that it is accessible through git so that you can clone and edit the docs on your computer. At the risk of making people complain that I'm bringing up too many wild ideas: would it be an option to continue the documentation effort on the git wiki available here: https://github.com/hollie/misterhouse/wiki wiki access goes through gi...@gi...:hollie/misterhouse.wiki Any opinions on that? Key advantages according me: * anybody can contribute without having to ask permission, so as open as wikispaces is * option to update docs offline, versioning is available through the same method as the source code is * one of the documentations formats supported for rendering on the git wiki is the POD format. Might help in bringing existing POD documentation from the source files to the wiki without too much work. Best regards, Lieven. Op 15-dec.-2012, om 17:01 heeft "Michael Stovenour" <mi...@st...> het volgende geschreven: > Hi Liven, > Understood, I just don't want to make assumptions about the future of the > SVN trunk. I have my opinion (which sounds like it is the same as yours) > but I don't want to assume. If we have rough consensus that the Git master > is the future of Misterhouse then I'll consider that while updating the > wiki. For example I could: > Create pages that describe or point to git instructions > Burry all references to svn in an archive section > Rewrite the Insteon pages to describe the new syntax > > Are we there yet as a group? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lieven Hollevoet [mailto:li...@li...] > Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 9:28 AM > To: The main list for the MisterHouse home automation program > Subject: Re: [mh] Insteon Branch (Git Master) MHT Format > > Hi Michael, > >> Does anyone have opinions as to how we manage the documentation going >> forward? I'd like to mark up the changes for the new format. It sounds >> like we might still have two valid branches; Git master and svn trunk. > Does >> the wiki need to document both? > > IMHO we should proceed with the git master. SVN trunk is not merged with > Insteon, only the git master is. So the new format only applies to the git > master. Or am I missing something? > > Best regards, > Lieven. > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > -- > LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial > Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support > Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services > Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d > ________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from this list, go to: > http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=1365 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial > Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support > Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services > Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers > http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d > ________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from this list, go to: http://sourceforge.net/mail/?group_id=1365 > |