Re: [mh] New MH versions

[George F. <fa...@sh...>]

On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 22:56 -0500, Gregg Liming wrote:
> George Farris wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 18:37 -0500, Gary Sanders wrote:
> >> Soapbox Mode ON:
> >>
> >> A few others have asked very similar questions recently, and to be 
> >> honest, I haven't seen a definitive answer that gives me a warm and 
> >> fuzzy feeling.
> >>
> > 
> > Are there any developers on this the list that can give us a clue as to
> > whether the MH code is still a viable option to work on?
> 
> Are you serious?  If so, I don't have a clue as to how to respond to 
> your question.
> 

Yes it was a serious question.  I can provide many examples of complete
code re-writes as time goes by.  I've done it myself actually.  I have
no idea whether the current code base of MH is viable or not which is
why I asked the question.

I kind of assume by your response that the answer is yes it is in very
good shape and that's great.  I in no way meant any disrespect of the
developers.  It was a valid question?

George