From: Gregg L. <gr...@li...> - 2009-02-24 18:48:24
|
Marc MERLIN wrote: > Running: rlink blk1 1 scan link table > [Insteon_Device] $rlink_blk1_1 accessing memory at location: 0x0FF8 > (...) > [Insteon_Device] $rlink_blk1_1 accessing memory at location: 0x0FF0 > (...) > [Insteon_PLM] Processing message for $rlink_blk1_1 > [Insteon_Device] $rlink_blk1_1 completed link memory scan > [Insteon_Device] link table for $rlink_blk1_1 (devcat: 0005 # v1.0): ^^^^^^ I just noticed that. Do you have that verbatim in your items.mht entry? If so, get rid of it since " # v1.0" is definitely not part of a devcat. > [Insteon_Device] aldb 077e87061 [0x0FE8] contlr(06) record to 077e87(01), (d1:06, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0a99e5041 [0x0FD0] contlr(04) record to $lvr_lamp(01), (d1:04, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0ed9ee011 [0x0FA8] contlr(01) record to $PLM(01), (d1:fe, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0ed9ee021 [0x0F90] contlr(02) record to $PLM(01), (d1:fe, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0ed9ee031 [0x0FC0] contlr(03) record to $PLM(01), (d1:fe, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0ed9ee041 [0x0FB8] contlr(04) record to $PLM(01), (d1:fe, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0ed9ee051 [0x0FA0] contlr(05) record to $PLM(01), (d1:fe, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0ed9ee061 [0x0F98] contlr(06) record to $PLM(01), (d1:fe, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0f054e051 [0x0FD8] contlr(05) record to $fmr_mast(01), (d1:05, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0f0f9a031 [0x0FF0] contlr(03) record to $lvr_dmr(01), (d1:03, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0f2687011 [0x0FB0] contlr(01) record to $gar_slav(01), (d1:01, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0f2687051 [0x0FF8] contlr(05) record to $gar_slav(01), (d1:05, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0f2736011 [0x0FC8] contlr(01) record to $gar_mast(01), (d1:01, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] aldb 0f72ec021 [0x0FE0] contlr(02) record to 0f72ec(01), (d1:02, d2:00, d3:00) > [Insteon_Device] adlb [0x0F88] is empty > > (I checked the many lines I snipped and they all look ok) > > Here again, the differences I noticed: > 1) button 2 shows it's linked to some unknow 0f72ec, which I might have had > in the past but it's definitely not showing 0F.82.87, yard_lights which I > know works right now > 2) button 5 is definitely not talking to $gar_slav(01), at least the switch > is not responding on #5, nor do I remember ever setting that. However, > button #5 should be actuating $fmr_slav in addition to $fmr_mast > > the other pairings are ok. I would suggest trying it a couple more times to see if it is consistent. If so, then send me off-list the complete log of the scan. Validating each memory read is quite pain-staking; so, I may not respond overly quickly. Gregg |