Re: [mh] sound_fork question

[Matthew W. <mat...@us...>]

Matthew Williams wrote:
> There are some comments there that suggest that the reason a fork is used is
> not to perform parallel tasks but to workaround a bug in using "system".  I
> personally don't even have a sound card on my mh box, so I am not sure of
> the impact of removing the waitpid.  It looks like Jim is having success
> without it, so I propose that we remove the waitpid and see if anyone
> notices negative effects.  Any objections?
> 

No objections seen, so I've committed the change as rev 1048.

Matt