From: Jason S. <ja...@sh...> - 2006-05-21 13:36:48
|
Ditto on people that summarily block on dyn ip's. I have had the same email address for a very long time and as a consequence I get 534 spam emails / day on average. I started working on my own spam filter a long time ago and in the process of my research found an existing one that did what I wanted: http://www.tmda.net . Used TMDA for about 4 years, no integration with your client email software needed (totally transparent), dont have a "junk mail" folder to check, and only have gotten only 4-6 spam emails in all that time (however they had legit emails so I can prosecute if I wanted) In that time 2 or so people got confused about the challenge so they ended up calling me ( Tech recruiters are for the most part unintuitively tech stupid ;) ) -J On Sat, 20 May 2006, David H. Lynch Jr. wrote: > Troy Carpenter wrote: > > On Thursday 18 May 2006 11:32, Joe Blecher wrote: > > > >> Resending as first attempt was blocked by your spam filter > >> > > > > Actually, looking at your email headers, I see that it's a bit more > > complicated for you, and it gets into a touchy area with those of us running > > our own mail servers. > > > > For better or worse, I don't directly accept email where the connecting relay > > is a dynamic address (like dialup, cable modems, or in your case, DSL). > There are numerous problems with this approach. Virtually all other > DNSBL techniques as well as most spam filtering techniques require poor > behavior before you get blocked. > Further, every other blocking mode provides a way out. In most > instances just behaving will get you unblocked. Rarely agreeing to not > misbehave is needed. But the Dialup/Cable/DSL block lists presume guilt, > with no possibility of redemption. That is the first biggy. > > Relaying through somebody else unnecescarily delay's e-mail as well > as complicating delivery. Not to mention it may be a violation of their > terms of use. > > Numerous businesses with legitimate fixed IP service use another ISP > to provide load balancing, failover. On servers I manage I deliberately > configure outgoing SMTP and HTTP traffic to use a higher bandwidth lower > cost backup cable . > > Further, the dialup/cable/dsl blocklists contain numerous errors. > Atleast one server I manage is one a valid fixed IP. Yet it is in the > block list. And many cable IP's are not. > > Finally there is no such thing as a dynamic IP. DHCP is a means of > providing machines with IP's. Many easily publically accessible systems > have their IP's assigned via DHCP. Many systems on the blocklist have > their IP's assigned statically. > > Blocking e-mail using the dialup block lists is buying into the > perception that their are different classes of servers on the internet. > > For many of us this is a very touchy subject. I support most of what > MAPS does. I am totally in aggreement with blocking mailserver based on > past bad behavior. > But the Dialup IP list goes against most of the principles the > internet is based on. > > I would rather get a little more SPAM (and there are many other much > more effective techniques of reducing it) that censure people based on > their ISP. > > Huge amounts of SPAM have come via hotmail and aol. Should we just > block, aol and hotmail ? It is not fundimentally different. > > > I do not have polite things to say about mail administrators that > presume that my mail server or any I manage are going to misbehave. To > accomidate them I either have to configure my mail servers to relay > their mail through my cable ISP, or I have to send their traffic out via > the higher cost lower bandwidth DSL - increasing the load for my inbound > clients. > > Regardless, I end up with alot of work to handle a small number of > mail servers - and I end up having to do it manually. > I want to start my own DNS block list for mailservers that block > "dialup ISP's". > > > > > > -- > Dave Lynch DLA Systems > Software Development: Embedded Linux > 717.627.3770 dh...@dl... http://www.dlasys.net > fax: 1.253.369.9244 Cell: 1.717.587.7774 > Over 25 years' experience in platforms, languages, and technologies too numerous to list. > > "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." > Albert Einstein > > |