From: Gregg L. <gr...@li...> - 2005-05-23 02:52:24
|
Bruce Winter wrote: > In theory, the mh code should parse out the static 'new' and 'add' > method calls unless they are nested in a conditional clause. That's good to know (clearly, I didn't). Are there additional method names that can be assumed to be scanned/parsed and treated in like manner? Is the parsing performed by specifically looking for a match against some set of pre-determined method names (e.g., "add") or does some "flag" exist that can tell the parser to treat the method as "single pass"? If the latter, does a coding convention exist to make these methods inherently "safe" against recurring loop calls? Gregg |