From: Sean W. <li...@su...> - 2004-12-02 00:45:21
|
>Ok--two thoughts come to mind: (1) I'm guessing that this might be >handled via the Sphinx4 recognizer class (logic). I realize that we're >feeding it phrases of specific MH commands to recognize; but hopefully >there would be hooks in the recognizer to report parseable utterances >that don't happen to match the command phrases. > > Good assumption, especially considering that it is correct. There are means to do that inside the recognizer (or a similar class). >(2) I'm currently thinking that the xAP external.command schema that >Jason used for his asterisk -> mh command integration might also be >used. Essentially, the asterisk IVR and sphynx recognized speech are >performing the same operation. That way, the interface remains (at >least initially) the same on the mh side and reduces some of the >integration burden. On the subject of "I didn't recognize that", either >the external.command schema gets elaborated to include additional args >or perhaps consider some other (new?) xAP message schema for that support. > > To be honest, I know nothing of xAP except what I've read on this list. I do concur that only using the currently built interface is the proper way to go. Why reinvent the wheel? -- Sean Walker http://sean.surfmy.net/ http://sacwifi.net/ |