Re: [misterhouse-users] RE: sphinx2 debug

[Sean W. <li...@su...>]

Robert Rozman wrote:

>Hi,
>
>thanks for info. I'd just kindly ask if you can describe in few words the
>difference between this implementation and your code ?
>
>How useful is sphinx2, sphinx 4 ?
>
>Regards,
>
>Robert.
>
>  
>
Well, the real difference is that perlbox uses a Tk frontend and the MH 
sphinx stuff just connects to MH with no front-end. It also does some 
different processing on the text supplied to transform the voice 
commands into sentences rather that individual words to recognize.

Sphinx2 is pretty good, very cryptic API if you want to do anything more 
powerful with it. Sphinx4 is in beta right now and has an extremely easy 
to use API. Alas, I'm no Java programmer and I can just scratch away 
painfully at getting anything useful done with it. For me, neither is 
productive! ;) I use Sphinx2 at home for VR and have been attempting 
(slowly) to interface to Sphinx4 as of a few weeks ago.

-- 
Sean Walker
http://sean.surfmy.net/
http://sacwifi.net/