|
From: Paul B. <pau...@as...> - 2003-06-04 12:32:33
|
A couple of user comments/requests following the recent updates to the mingw sourceforge download page: 1. Could the candidate gcj and proposed gpc packages be recompiled to work with the new gcc 3.2.3 main package? One relies on 3.2 and the other on 3.2.2. 2. What happened to the snapshot ada-gcc 3.3 package previously on the page? 3. What has happened to the release dates on the download page? They all say 2003-05-11, even the recent update to mingw32-make on 2003-05-30! Thanks for all the hard work on making mingw so useful. Paul Butcher Alton, Hants, UK |
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-04 18:48:25
|
Paul Butcher wrote: > A couple of user comments/requests following the recent updates to the mingw > sourceforge download page: > > 1. Could the candidate gcj and proposed gpc packages be recompiled to work > with the new gcc 3.2.3 main package? One relies on 3.2 and the other on > 3.2.2. > No answer. I'm thinking this one. > 2. What happened to the snapshot ada-gcc 3.3 package previously on the page? > What ada-gcc 3.3 package? I remember a non functioning 3.2 version. > 3. What has happened to the release dates on the download page? They all say > 2003-05-11, even the recent update to mingw32-make on 2003-05-30! > Blame me for this. The file timestamps are the release for the package. The changes we've made are to help dynamically create the data for the download.shtml page. Unless the release technitian remembers to change the ``release date'' for the SF FRS page then that date will remain static. > Thanks for all the hard work on making mingw so useful. > Mostly pleasurable, Earnie. |
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-05 18:22:51
|
Earnie Boyd wrote: > >> 3. What has happened to the release dates on the download page? They >> all say 2003-05-11, even the recent update to mingw32-make on 2003-05-30! >> > > Blame me for this. The file timestamps are the release for the package. > The changes we've made are to help dynamically create the data for the > download.shtml page. Unless the release technitian remembers to change > the ``release date'' for the SF FRS page then that date will remain static. > I've updated my script to add file size and timestamp to the table on the Download page. These are the release dates for the file. Earnie. |
|
From: Ranjit M. <rm...@ho...> - 2003-06-05 04:22:25
|
> 1. Could the candidate gcj and proposed gpc packages be recompiled to work
> with the new gcc 3.2.3 main package? One relies on 3.2 and the other on
> 3.2.2.
GCJ 3.2 is quite outdated and 3.3 is *far* better,
especially for users on Windows. If you can't
wait till the official MinGW release, you can get
pre-compiled GCJ 3.3 binaries for Win32 at:
http://www.thisiscool.com/gcc33_mingw.htm
HTH.
Ranjit.
--
Ranjit Mathew Email: rmathew AT hotmail DOT com
Bangalore, INDIA. Web: http://ranjitmathew.tripod.com/
|
|
From: Chris B. <ki...@bi...> - 2003-06-05 05:08:52
|
I have been attempting to build a cross compiler that runs under Windows 2000 but which generates code for i386/linux. I have had little success so far. I would be most grateful if anyone could point me at a source of information on how to do this. Best regards, Chris Bishop |
|
From: Luke D. <cod...@ho...> - 2003-06-05 10:35:19
|
I don't know where you would find instructions except perhaps on the mailing list archives (I seem to recall users building MinGW-hosted cross-compilers for arm-pe or something). Anyway, what exact troubles are you having? Is the problem with building a cross-binutils or have you already done that and are trying GCC? Perhaps most importantly, are you using the MSYS shell or Cygwin or ...? BTW, if you are using the official source releases of binutils/GCC you might want to try the patched MinGW source instead (the latest versions). Luke ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Bishop" <ki...@bi...> To: <min...@li...> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:09 PM Subject: [Mingw-users] How to build a cross compiler > I have been attempting to build a cross compiler that runs under > Windows 2000 but which generates code for i386/linux. > > I have had little success so far. > > I would be most grateful if anyone could point me at a source of > information on how to do this. > > Best regards, > > Chris Bishop |
|
From: Brenden T. <br...@rc...> - 2003-06-05 15:26:52
|
Cross gcc mailing list here: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/crossgcc/ Cross gcc FAQ here: http://www.sthoward.com/CrossGCC/ This FAQ looks kinda old, but I expect the folks on the mailing list will know what's up to date and where to get it. Good luck. Luke Dunstan wrote: >I don't know where you would find instructions except perhaps on the mailing >list archives (I seem to recall users building MinGW-hosted cross-compilers >for arm-pe or something). Anyway, what exact troubles are you having? Is the >problem with building a cross-binutils or have you already done that and are >trying GCC? Perhaps most importantly, are you using the MSYS shell or Cygwin >or ...? BTW, if you are using the official source releases of binutils/GCC >you might want to try the patched MinGW source instead (the latest >versions). > >Luke > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Chris Bishop" <ki...@bi...> >To: <min...@li...> >Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:09 PM >Subject: [Mingw-users] How to build a cross compiler > > > > >>I have been attempting to build a cross compiler that runs under >>Windows 2000 but which generates code for i386/linux. >> >>I have had little success so far. >> >>I would be most grateful if anyone could point me at a source of >>information on how to do this. >> >>Best regards, >> >>Chris Bishop >> >> > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best >thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features >you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >_______________________________________________ >MinGW-users mailing list >Min...@li... > >You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > > > > |
|
From: Chris B. <ki...@bi...> - 2003-06-09 01:42:30
|
Luke and others who responded to my original message,
Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after
having to work on other things.
To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under
Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux.
My system:
Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM
Installed:
MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe
MSYS-1.0.8.exe
Obtained copies of:
binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz
gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz
Placed these in directory:
~/xmingw
Changed directory to:
~/xmingw
Executed:
gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf -
mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1
cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \
--target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \
--prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \
> ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1
cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \
make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1
(Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz
unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than
binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!)
There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the
binutils-configure.log.
The make however fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log
being:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl'
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 bindtextdom.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 dcgettext.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 dgettext.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 gettext.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 finddomain.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 loadmsgcat.c
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 localealias.c
localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\M'
localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\o'
localealias.c:156:42: \x used with no following hex digits
localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\s'
localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\l'
make[2]: *** [localealias.o] Error 1
On examining localealias.c, it would appear that the problem is
related to the ":." at the end of aliaspath in
binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl/Makefile.
At least, removing the :. does fix this problem even if it isn't the
correct solution.
With this change (even if not totally appropriate), binutils build
seems to complete OK.
I now execute:
cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \
make install > ../binutils-install.log 2>&1
This fails and the last few relevant lines of binutils-install.log
are:
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/bfd/doc'
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'.
make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'.
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/bfd/doc'
gcc -c -I.. -I./.. -I./../../include -I./../../intl -I../../intl -g -O2 ./chew.c
0 [main] sh 1352 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump
make[3]: *** [chew.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The contents of sh.exe.stackdump are:
Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=710980DD
eax=312E322C ebx=0A0252D8 ecx=00000108 edx=00000109 esi=0A0253D8 edi=0A0252D0
ebp=0022E1F8 esp=0022E1D0 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe
cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023
Stack trace:
Frame Function Args
0022E1F8 710980DD (710A4020, 0A0252D8, 0022E238, 7109008E)
0022E218 710308B5 (0A0252D8, 0000120E, 0022E5D8, 710434C7)
0022E238 71030728 (0A0252D8, 0A028A58, 534D2F3A, 6C2F7379)
0022E5D8 71044477 (0A01BFDC, 0A0275C0, 0022F9B8, 71061A45)
0022F9B8 71061A55 (00000000, 0A019160, 0A019818, 0A019570)
0022F9F8 710635FA (00000000, 00000003, 0A019160, 0A019818)
0022FA28 71010A9B (0A019160, 0A019818, 0A019570, 710A4020)
0022FA48 7108CF76 (0A019160, 0A019818, 0A019570, 710A92E4)
0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019160, 0A019818, 0A019570, 0042B3C4)
0022FB74 00412706 (0A019360, 00000000, 0A0190F8, FFFFFFFF)
0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018E10, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000)
0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018DF8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF)
0022FCA4 004499BB (0A0188A8, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E)
0022FCD4 00403180 (7159F28C, 710A4368, 0022FD74, 00401858)
0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715A03FC, 0A010278, 00000000)
0022FE70 71004568 (00000000, 00000000, 0022BA04, 8044CC2E)
End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present)
My apologies for the length of this message.
Any help would be most appreciated. I have been fighting this problem
for some time now and no matter what I do I just don't seem to get
anywhere.
Best regards,
Chris Bishop
Thursday, June 5, 2003, 10:35:09 PM, you wrote:
LD> I don't know where you would find instructions except perhaps on the mailing
LD> list archives (I seem to recall users building MinGW-hosted cross-compilers
LD> for arm-pe or something). Anyway, what exact troubles are you having? Is the
LD> problem with building a cross-binutils or have you already done that and are
LD> trying GCC? Perhaps most importantly, are you using the MSYS shell or Cygwin
LD> or ...? BTW, if you are using the official source releases of binutils/GCC
LD> you might want to try the patched MinGW source instead (the latest
LD> versions).
LD> Luke
LD> ----- Original Message -----
LD> From: "Chris Bishop" <ki...@bi...>
LD> To: <min...@li...>
LD> Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 1:09 PM
LD> Subject: [Mingw-users] How to build a cross compiler
>> I have been attempting to build a cross compiler that runs under
>> Windows 2000 but which generates code for i386/linux.
>>
>> I have had little success so far.
>>
>> I would be most grateful if anyone could point me at a source of
>> information on how to do this.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Chris Bishop
LD> -------------------------------------------------------
LD> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
LD> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
LD> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
LD> _______________________________________________
LD> MinGW-users mailing list
LD> Min...@li...
LD> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
LD> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users
|
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-09 11:17:40
|
Chris Bishop wrote: > Luke and others who responded to my original message, > > Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after > having to work on other things. > > To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under > Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux. > > My system: > Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM > Installed: > MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe > MSYS-1.0.8.exe Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot. Thanks, Earnie. |
|
From: Chris B. <ki...@bi...> - 2003-06-09 22:12:06
|
Earnie,
Thanks for your suggestion. I have re-installed MinGW and MSys so
details are now:
My system:
Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM
Installed:
MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe
MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe
Obtained copies of:
binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz
gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz
Placed these in directory:
~/xmingw
Changed directory to:
~/xmingw
Executed:
gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf -
mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1
cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \
--target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \
--prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \
> ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1
cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \
make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1
(Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz
unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than
binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!)
There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the
binutils-configure.log.
But the make now fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log
being:
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl'
gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c
0 [main] sh 1316 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump
make[2]: *** [intl-compat.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
and the sh.exe.stackdump is now:
Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=71090DBE
eax=715C8F73 ebx=715C8984 ecx=715CD000 edx=715CC77E esi=715C8FFE edi=715C8984
ebp=0022E208 esp=0022E200 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe
cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023
Stack trace:
Frame Function Args
0022E208 71090DBE (715C8FFE, 715C877C, 0A01ACF3, 71002BAF)
0022E238 71090C75 (715C8984, 715C877C, 0022E5D8, 71043D35)
0022E5D8 71043D47 (0A01ACFD, 715C9B94, 0022F9B8, 710620C8)
0022F9B8 710620D8 (00000000, 0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838)
0022F9F8 71063C9A (00000000, 00000003, 0A019288, 0A0192F0)
0022FA28 710114BB (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710A5020)
0022FA48 7108DB92 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710AA608)
0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 0042B3C4)
0022FB74 00412706 (0A019410, 00000000, 0A0191B0, FFFFFFFF)
0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018D00, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000)
0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018CE8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF)
0022FCA4 004499BB (0A018728, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E)
0022FCD4 00403180 (715B3A94, 710A5368, 0022FD74, 00401858)
0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715B3CB4, 0A010278, 00000000)
0022FE70 71004FA8 (00000000, 00000000, 00000006, 8113BDC8)
0022FF40 710051F1 (004011C8, 00000006, 811A3B40, 811A39E0)
End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present)
Any help would be appreciated.
Best regards,
Chris Bishop
Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote:
EB> Chris Bishop wrote:
>> Luke and others who responded to my original message,
>>
>> Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after
>> having to work on other things.
>>
>> To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under
>> Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux.
>>
>> My system:
>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM
>> Installed:
>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe
>> MSYS-1.0.8.exe
EB> Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See
EB> http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot.
EB> Thanks,
EB> Earnie.
|
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-09 23:42:54
|
I've marked this for my immediate review. Earnie. Chris Bishop wrote: > Earnie, > > Thanks for your suggestion. I have re-installed MinGW and MSys so > details are now: > > My system: > Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM > Installed: > MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe > MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe > Obtained copies of: > binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz > gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz > Placed these in directory: > ~/xmingw > Changed directory to: > ~/xmingw > Executed: > gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf - > mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 > cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \ > --target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ > --prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \ > > ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1 > cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \ > make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1 > (Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz > unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than > binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!) > > There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the > binutils-configure.log. > > But the make now fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log > being: > > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl' > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c > 0 [main] sh 1316 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump > make[2]: *** [intl-compat.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > and the sh.exe.stackdump is now: > > Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=71090DBE > eax=715C8F73 ebx=715C8984 ecx=715CD000 edx=715CC77E esi=715C8FFE edi=715C8984 > ebp=0022E208 esp=0022E200 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe > cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023 > Stack trace: > Frame Function Args > 0022E208 71090DBE (715C8FFE, 715C877C, 0A01ACF3, 71002BAF) > 0022E238 71090C75 (715C8984, 715C877C, 0022E5D8, 71043D35) > 0022E5D8 71043D47 (0A01ACFD, 715C9B94, 0022F9B8, 710620C8) > 0022F9B8 710620D8 (00000000, 0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838) > 0022F9F8 71063C9A (00000000, 00000003, 0A019288, 0A0192F0) > 0022FA28 710114BB (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710A5020) > 0022FA48 7108DB92 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710AA608) > 0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 0042B3C4) > 0022FB74 00412706 (0A019410, 00000000, 0A0191B0, FFFFFFFF) > 0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018D00, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000) > 0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018CE8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF) > 0022FCA4 004499BB (0A018728, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E) > 0022FCD4 00403180 (715B3A94, 710A5368, 0022FD74, 00401858) > 0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715B3CB4, 0A010278, 00000000) > 0022FE70 71004FA8 (00000000, 00000000, 00000006, 8113BDC8) > 0022FF40 710051F1 (004011C8, 00000006, 811A3B40, 811A39E0) > End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present) > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Chris Bishop > > Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote: > > > > EB> Chris Bishop wrote: > >>>Luke and others who responded to my original message, >>> >>>Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after >>>having to work on other things. >>> >>>To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under >>>Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux. >>> >>>My system: >>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM >>>Installed: >>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe >>> MSYS-1.0.8.exe > > > EB> Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See > EB> http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot. > > EB> Thanks, > EB> Earnie. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > |
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-10 15:29:13
|
Hmm... Where did you install MinGW?? MinGW can't live in the bin directory of MSYS. See ``start /doc/msys/README.rtf''. Earnie. Chris Bishop wrote: > Earnie, > > Thanks for your suggestion. I have re-installed MinGW and MSys so > details are now: > > My system: > Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM > Installed: > MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe > MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe > Obtained copies of: > binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz > gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz > Placed these in directory: > ~/xmingw > Changed directory to: > ~/xmingw > Executed: > gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf - > mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 > cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \ > --target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ > --prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \ > > ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1 > cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \ > make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1 > (Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz > unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than > binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!) > > There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the > binutils-configure.log. > > But the make now fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log > being: > > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl' > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c > 0 [main] sh 1316 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump > make[2]: *** [intl-compat.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > and the sh.exe.stackdump is now: > > Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=71090DBE > eax=715C8F73 ebx=715C8984 ecx=715CD000 edx=715CC77E esi=715C8FFE edi=715C8984 > ebp=0022E208 esp=0022E200 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe > cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023 > Stack trace: > Frame Function Args > 0022E208 71090DBE (715C8FFE, 715C877C, 0A01ACF3, 71002BAF) > 0022E238 71090C75 (715C8984, 715C877C, 0022E5D8, 71043D35) > 0022E5D8 71043D47 (0A01ACFD, 715C9B94, 0022F9B8, 710620C8) > 0022F9B8 710620D8 (00000000, 0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838) > 0022F9F8 71063C9A (00000000, 00000003, 0A019288, 0A0192F0) > 0022FA28 710114BB (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710A5020) > 0022FA48 7108DB92 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710AA608) > 0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 0042B3C4) > 0022FB74 00412706 (0A019410, 00000000, 0A0191B0, FFFFFFFF) > 0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018D00, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000) > 0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018CE8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF) > 0022FCA4 004499BB (0A018728, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E) > 0022FCD4 00403180 (715B3A94, 710A5368, 0022FD74, 00401858) > 0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715B3CB4, 0A010278, 00000000) > 0022FE70 71004FA8 (00000000, 00000000, 00000006, 8113BDC8) > 0022FF40 710051F1 (004011C8, 00000006, 811A3B40, 811A39E0) > End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present) > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Best regards, > > Chris Bishop > > Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote: > > > > EB> Chris Bishop wrote: > >>>Luke and others who responded to my original message, >>> >>>Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after >>>having to work on other things. >>> >>>To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under >>>Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux. >>> >>>My system: >>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM >>>Installed: >>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe >>> MSYS-1.0.8.exe > > > EB> Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See > EB> http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot. > > EB> Thanks, > EB> Earnie. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > |
|
From: Chris B. <ki...@bi...> - 2003-06-11 03:17:45
|
Earnie,
No - I didn't fall into that trap.
I first installed MinGW from MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe into F:\MSys\MinGW (at
this stage F:\MSys\MinGW did not previously exist).
I then installed MSys from MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe into F:\MSys.
When asked about location of MinGW, I entered F:/MSys/MinGW
I have also tried installing in completely separate directories:
MinGW in F:\MinGW
and
MSys in F:\MSys
But the results are the same.
Other than MinGW and MSys as above, is there anything else I should be
installing?
Best regards,
Chris Bishop
Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 3:29:00 AM, you wrote:
EB> Hmm...
EB> Where did you install MinGW?? MinGW can't live in the bin directory of
EB> MSYS. See ``start /doc/msys/README.rtf''.
EB> Earnie.
EB> Chris Bishop wrote:
>> Earnie,
>>
>> Thanks for your suggestion. I have re-installed MinGW and MSys so
>> details are now:
>>
>> My system:
>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM
>> Installed:
>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe
>> MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe
>> Obtained copies of:
>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz
>> gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz
>> Placed these in directory:
>> ~/xmingw
>> Changed directory to:
>> ~/xmingw
>> Executed:
>> gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf -
>> mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1
>> cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \
>> --target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \
>> --prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \
>> > ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1
>> cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \
>> make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1
>> (Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz
>> unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than
>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!)
>>
>> There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the
>> binutils-configure.log.
>>
>> But the make now fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log
>> being:
>>
>> make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl'
>> gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c
>> 0 [main] sh 1316 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump
>> make[2]: *** [intl-compat.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>
>> and the sh.exe.stackdump is now:
>>
>> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=71090DBE
>> eax=715C8F73 ebx=715C8984 ecx=715CD000 edx=715CC77E esi=715C8FFE edi=715C8984
>> ebp=0022E208 esp=0022E200 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe
>> cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023
>> Stack trace:
>> Frame Function Args
>> 0022E208 71090DBE (715C8FFE, 715C877C, 0A01ACF3, 71002BAF)
>> 0022E238 71090C75 (715C8984, 715C877C, 0022E5D8, 71043D35)
>> 0022E5D8 71043D47 (0A01ACFD, 715C9B94, 0022F9B8, 710620C8)
>> 0022F9B8 710620D8 (00000000, 0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838)
>> 0022F9F8 71063C9A (00000000, 00000003, 0A019288, 0A0192F0)
>> 0022FA28 710114BB (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710A5020)
>> 0022FA48 7108DB92 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710AA608)
>> 0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 0042B3C4)
>> 0022FB74 00412706 (0A019410, 00000000, 0A0191B0, FFFFFFFF)
>> 0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018D00, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000)
>> 0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018CE8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF)
>> 0022FCA4 004499BB (0A018728, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E)
>> 0022FCD4 00403180 (715B3A94, 710A5368, 0022FD74, 00401858)
>> 0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715B3CB4, 0A010278, 00000000)
>> 0022FE70 71004FA8 (00000000, 00000000, 00000006, 8113BDC8)
>> 0022FF40 710051F1 (004011C8, 00000006, 811A3B40, 811A39E0)
>> End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present)
>>
>> Any help would be appreciated.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Chris Bishop
>>
>> Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> EB> Chris Bishop wrote:
>>
>>>>Luke and others who responded to my original message,
>>>>
>>>>Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after
>>>>having to work on other things.
>>>>
>>>>To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under
>>>>Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux.
>>>>
>>>>My system:
>>>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM
>>>>Installed:
>>>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe
>>>> MSYS-1.0.8.exe
>>
>>
>> EB> Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See
>> EB> http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot.
>>
>> EB> Thanks,
>> EB> Earnie.
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
>> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
>> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
>> _______________________________________________
>> MinGW-users mailing list
>> Min...@li...
>>
>> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users
>>
EB> -------------------------------------------------------
EB> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
EB> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features
EB> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com.
EB> _______________________________________________
EB> MinGW-users mailing list
EB> Min...@li...
EB> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at:
EB> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users
|
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-11 11:03:46
|
Chris Bishop wrote: > Earnie, > > No - I didn't fall into that trap. > > I first installed MinGW from MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe into F:\MSys\MinGW (at > this stage F:\MSys\MinGW did not previously exist). > > I then installed MSys from MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe into F:\MSys. > When asked about location of MinGW, I entered F:/MSys/MinGW > > I have also tried installing in completely separate directories: > MinGW in F:\MinGW > and > MSys in F:\MSys > > But the results are the same. > Ok, just trying to elimnate possibilities with what I was seeing in the stackdump. I'll give it a try here. > Other than MinGW and MSys as above, is there anything else I should be > installing? > No, that should be enough. Earnie. > Best regards, > > Chris Bishop > > Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 3:29:00 AM, you wrote: > > EB> Hmm... > > EB> Where did you install MinGW?? MinGW can't live in the bin directory of > EB> MSYS. See ``start /doc/msys/README.rtf''. > > EB> Earnie. > > EB> Chris Bishop wrote: > >>>Earnie, >>> >>>Thanks for your suggestion. I have re-installed MinGW and MSys so >>>details are now: >>> >>>My system: >>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM >>>Installed: >>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe >>> MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe >>>Obtained copies of: >>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz >>> gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz >>>Placed these in directory: >>> ~/xmingw >>>Changed directory to: >>> ~/xmingw >>>Executed: >>> gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf - >>> mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 >>> cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \ >>> --target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ >>> --prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \ >>> > ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1 >>> cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \ >>> make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1 >>>(Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz >>>unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than >>>binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!) >>> >>>There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the >>>binutils-configure.log. >>> >>>But the make now fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log >>>being: >>> >>>make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl' >>>gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c >>> 0 [main] sh 1316 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump >>>make[2]: *** [intl-compat.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>> >>>and the sh.exe.stackdump is now: >>> >>>Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=71090DBE >>>eax=715C8F73 ebx=715C8984 ecx=715CD000 edx=715CC77E esi=715C8FFE edi=715C8984 >>>ebp=0022E208 esp=0022E200 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe >>>cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023 >>>Stack trace: >>>Frame Function Args >>>0022E208 71090DBE (715C8FFE, 715C877C, 0A01ACF3, 71002BAF) >>>0022E238 71090C75 (715C8984, 715C877C, 0022E5D8, 71043D35) >>>0022E5D8 71043D47 (0A01ACFD, 715C9B94, 0022F9B8, 710620C8) >>>0022F9B8 710620D8 (00000000, 0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838) >>>0022F9F8 71063C9A (00000000, 00000003, 0A019288, 0A0192F0) >>>0022FA28 710114BB (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710A5020) >>>0022FA48 7108DB92 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710AA608) >>>0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 0042B3C4) >>>0022FB74 00412706 (0A019410, 00000000, 0A0191B0, FFFFFFFF) >>>0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018D00, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000) >>>0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018CE8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF) >>>0022FCA4 004499BB (0A018728, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E) >>>0022FCD4 00403180 (715B3A94, 710A5368, 0022FD74, 00401858) >>>0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715B3CB4, 0A010278, 00000000) >>>0022FE70 71004FA8 (00000000, 00000000, 00000006, 8113BDC8) >>>0022FF40 710051F1 (004011C8, 00000006, 811A3B40, 811A39E0) >>>End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present) >>> >>>Any help would be appreciated. >>> >>>Best regards, >>> >>>Chris Bishop >>> >>>Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>EB> Chris Bishop wrote: >>> >>> >>>>>Luke and others who responded to my original message, >>>>> >>>>>Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this after >>>>>having to work on other things. >>>>> >>>>>To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under >>>>>Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux. >>>>> >>>>>My system: >>>>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM >>>>>Installed: >>>>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe >>>>> MSYS-1.0.8.exe >>> >>> >>>EB> Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See >>>EB> http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot. >>> >>>EB> Thanks, >>>EB> Earnie. >>> >>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best >>>thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features >>>you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >>>_______________________________________________ >>>MinGW-users mailing list >>>Min...@li... >>> >>>You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users >>> > > > > > EB> ------------------------------------------------------- > EB> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > EB> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > EB> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > EB> _______________________________________________ > EB> MinGW-users mailing list > EB> Min...@li... > > EB> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > EB> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > |
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-13 19:12:14
|
I've been able to more than once create the linux target with the version of the MSYS snapshot just uploaded. Earnie. Earnie Boyd wrote: > Chris Bishop wrote: > >> Earnie, >> >> No - I didn't fall into that trap. >> >> I first installed MinGW from MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe into F:\MSys\MinGW (at >> this stage F:\MSys\MinGW did not previously exist). >> >> I then installed MSys from MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe into F:\MSys. >> When asked about location of MinGW, I entered F:/MSys/MinGW >> >> I have also tried installing in completely separate directories: >> MinGW in F:\MinGW >> and >> MSys in F:\MSys >> >> But the results are the same. >> > > Ok, just trying to elimnate possibilities with what I was seeing in the > stackdump. I'll give it a try here. > >> Other than MinGW and MSys as above, is there anything else I should be >> installing? >> > > No, that should be enough. > > Earnie. > >> Best regards, >> >> Chris Bishop >> >> Wednesday, June 11, 2003, 3:29:00 AM, you wrote: >> >> EB> Hmm... >> >> EB> Where did you install MinGW?? MinGW can't live in the bin >> directory of EB> MSYS. See ``start /doc/msys/README.rtf''. >> >> EB> Earnie. >> >> EB> Chris Bishop wrote: >> >>>> Earnie, >>>> >>>> Thanks for your suggestion. I have re-installed MinGW and MSys so >>>> details are now: >>>> >>>> My system: >>>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM >>>> Installed: >>>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe >>>> MSYS-1.0.9-2003.06.05-1.exe >>>> Obtained copies of: >>>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz >>>> gcc-3.2.3-20030504-1-src.tar.gz >>>> Placed these in directory: >>>> ~/xmingw >>>> Changed directory to: >>>> ~/xmingw >>>> Executed: >>>> gzip -dc binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz | tar xf - >>>> mv binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src >>>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 >>>> cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && ./configure \ >>>> --target=i386-pc-linux-gnu \ >>>> --prefix=/opt/xmingw32 \ >>>> > ../binutils-configure.log 2>&1 >>>> cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \ >>>> make "CFLAGS=-2 -O2" > ../binutils-build.log 2>&1 >>>> (Note: 'mv' line is because binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src.tar.gz >>>> unzips atypically to binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1-src rather than >>>> binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 and I like to keep things tidy!) >>>> >>>> There does not appear to be anything unexpected in the >>>> binutils-configure.log. >>>> >>>> But the make now fails with the relevant lines in binutils.build.log >>>> being: >>>> >>>> make[2]: Entering directory >>>> `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl' >>>> gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" >>>> -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" >>>> -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H >>>> -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c >>>> 0 [main] sh 1316 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to >>>> sh.exe.stackdump >>>> make[2]: *** [intl-compat.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped) >>>> >>>> and the sh.exe.stackdump is now: >>>> >>>> Exception: STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION at eip=71090DBE >>>> eax=715C8F73 ebx=715C8984 ecx=715CD000 edx=715CC77E esi=715C8FFE >>>> edi=715C8984 >>>> ebp=0022E208 esp=0022E200 program=F:\MSys\bin\sh.exe >>>> cs=001B ds=0023 es=0023 fs=0038 gs=0000 ss=0023 >>>> Stack trace: >>>> Frame Function Args >>>> 0022E208 71090DBE (715C8FFE, 715C877C, 0A01ACF3, 71002BAF) >>>> 0022E238 71090C75 (715C8984, 715C877C, 0022E5D8, 71043D35) >>>> 0022E5D8 71043D47 (0A01ACFD, 715C9B94, 0022F9B8, 710620C8) >>>> 0022F9B8 710620D8 (00000000, 0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838) >>>> 0022F9F8 71063C9A (00000000, 00000003, 0A019288, 0A0192F0) >>>> 0022FA28 710114BB (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710A5020) >>>> 0022FA48 7108DB92 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 710AA608) >>>> 0022FB18 004127A4 (0A019288, 0A0192F0, 0A019838, 0042B3C4) >>>> 0022FB74 00412706 (0A019410, 00000000, 0A0191B0, FFFFFFFF) >>>> 0022FBF4 00411CA7 (0A018D00, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF, 00000000) >>>> 0022FC54 0040E9C6 (0A018CE8, 00000000, FFFFFFFF, FFFFFFFF) >>>> 0022FCA4 004499BB (0A018728, 004022F9, 00000004, 00402F6E) >>>> 0022FCD4 00403180 (715B3A94, 710A5368, 0022FD74, 00401858) >>>> 0022FD74 00401873 (00000003, 715B3CB4, 0A010278, 00000000) >>>> 0022FE70 71004FA8 (00000000, 00000000, 00000006, 8113BDC8) >>>> 0022FF40 710051F1 (004011C8, 00000006, 811A3B40, 811A39E0) >>>> End of stack trace (more stack frames may be present) >>>> >>>> Any help would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> >>>> Chris Bishop >>>> >>>> Monday, June 9, 2003, 11:17:46 PM, you wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> EB> Chris Bishop wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>> Luke and others who responded to my original message, >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks for your offer of advice etc. Just got back to this >>>>>> after >>>>>> having to work on other things. >>>>>> >>>>>> To repeat what my needs are - I need a tool chain that executes under >>>>>> Windows 2000 to build applications to run on i386 linux. >>>>>> >>>>>> My system: >>>>>> Windows 2000 SP 3, on AMD Athlon XP1700+, 256MB RAM >>>>>> Installed: >>>>>> MinGW-2.0.0.3.exe >>>>>> MSYS-1.0.8.exe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> EB> Please try the latest MSYS Snapshot. See EB> >>>> http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml for references to the snapshot. >>>> >>>> EB> Thanks, >>>> EB> Earnie. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The >>>> best >>>> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features >>>> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> MinGW-users mailing list >>>> Min...@li... >>>> >>>> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users >>>> >> >> >> >> >> EB> ------------------------------------------------------- >> EB> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, >> The best >> EB> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging >> features >> EB> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >> EB> _______________________________________________ >> EB> MinGW-users mailing list >> EB> Min...@li... >> >> EB> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >> EB> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best >> thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features >> you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. >> _______________________________________________ >> MinGW-users mailing list >> Min...@li... >> >> You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best > thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging features > you've never dreamed of, try TotalView 6 free at www.etnus.com. > _______________________________________________ > MinGW-users mailing list > Min...@li... > > You may change your MinGW Account Options or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-users > |
|
From: Earnie B. <ear...@ya...> - 2003-06-11 13:23:53
|
Chris Bishop wrote: > > make[2]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl' > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 intl-compat.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 bindtextdom.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 dcgettext.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 dgettext.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 gettext.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 finddomain.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 loadmsgcat.c > gcc -c -DLOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DGNULOCALEDIR=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale\" -DLOCALE_ALIAS_PATH=\"/opt/xmingw32/share/locale:.\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -s -O2 localealias.c > localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\M' > localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\o' > localealias.c:156:42: \x used with no following hex digits > localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\s' > localealias.c:156:42: warning: unknown escape sequence '\l' > make[2]: *** [localealias.o] Error 1 > > On examining localealias.c, it would appear that the problem is > related to the ":." at the end of aliaspath in > binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/intl/Makefile. > > At least, removing the :. does fix this problem even if it isn't the > correct solution. > This is a result of translating variables with path lists within MSYS. The rule I use is that a path list must contain a \ directory separator and not a / directory separator. This causes the four warnings and one error and line 156 because when gcc sees LOCALE_ALIAS_PATH it has a value of "C:\MSYS\opt\xmingw32\share\locale:.". And gcc treats \ as translate the next character to an escape sequence. By removing :. the value is "C:/MSYS/opt/xmingw32/share/locale" and gcc likes this. > With this change (even if not totally appropriate), binutils build > seems to complete OK. > > I now execute: > cd binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1 && \ > make install > ../binutils-install.log 2>&1 > > This fails and the last few relevant lines of binutils-install.log > are: > > make[4]: Entering directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/bfd/doc' > make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-exec-am'. > make[4]: Nothing to be done for `install-data-am'. > make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/kit/xmingw/binutils-2.13.90-20030111-1/bfd/doc' > gcc -c -I.. -I./.. -I./../../include -I./../../intl -I../../intl -g -O2 ./chew.c > 0 [main] sh 1352 open_stackdumpfile: Dumping stack trace to sh.exe.stackdump > make[3]: *** [chew.o] Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > The contents of sh.exe.stackdump are: > I think I've found this problem. I'll upload a snapshot shortly. Earnie. |