Re: [Ming-dev] 0.4 branch and head

[strk <st...@ke...>]

Fine by me to have 0.4.4 come out of HEAD, but I'm not sure we can see
kerning support and button export as bugfixes rather than new
features (more for button export, not so sure about kerning)

--strk;

On Sat, Jun 05, 2010 at 05:08:27PM -0400, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> 
> To avoid having to double commit everything, let's just let the HEAD be 
> 0.4.4.
> When something comes along that would be a new feature instead of just a bug
> fix, we'll make a branch for 0.4.4 (And maybe even cut a release), and go
> back to letting HEAD be 0.5.
> 
> This is being a little bit sloppy, but the rate of change seems to be low
> enough right now that I don't really see it being a problem.
> 
> 
> On Sat, 5 Jun 2010, strk wrote:
> 
> >Stuart,
> >do you plan to continue maintaining the 0.4 branch of Ming ?
> >I'm asking because I'm only committing to HEAD at the moment
> >and we should bump the version numbers to tell HEAD apart
> >from last release.
> >
> >So, if 0.4 is to be continued we should bump HEAD to 0.5
> >and branch to 0.4.4, otherwise we'll bump HEAD to 0.4.4.
> >
> >I don't plan to do any major development in HEAD myself,
> >just bug fixes, and some are already committed in HEAD and
> >missing from branch (see ChangeLog).
> >
> >--strk;
> >
> > ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
> > /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html
> >
> 
> 
>                                 Stuart
> 
> Stuart R. Anderson                               and...@ne...
> Network & Software Engineering                   http://www.netsweng.com/
> 1024D/37A79149:                                  0791 D3B8 9A4C 2CDC A31F
>                                                  BD03 0A62 E534 37A7 9149

-- 

  ()   Free GIS & Flash consultant/developer
  /\   http://strk.keybit.net/services.html