|
From: Klaus R. <kla...@rz...> - 2008-01-22 10:52:08
|
> Perhaps it's an "interpretation" thing? > > They could be meaning the "assumed to be zero" as (badly worded) > "assumed to have no change", but somehow it got into the spec as you > have it. Code it, and if it does the trick it is fine for me... could you also add a testcase please ? Klaus |