Thread: [MiKTeX] Problem with the Bosisio macro package
MiKTeX source code moved to GitHub
Brought to you by:
csc
From: José C. S. <jcs...@fc...> - 2010-04-19 09:19:14
|
Hi all, Today, I tried to compile a LaTeX file which used the evenpage package, which is part of the Bosisio macro package. I got an error message saying that the file evenpage.sty could not be found. Then I decided to see whether or not I had a directory /tex/latex/bosisio within the MiKTeX 2.8 directory and it turned out that I did have it, but it was empty. Then I ran the Package Manager (as administrator), according to which the macro package Bosisio was installed. So, I uninstalled and then I installed it again. Apparently, all went well; I got this information: lightweight database digest: 3ac44d0d5cae18e9528adfdf02e2bf79 going to download 485588 bytes going to install 19 file(s) (1 package(s)) downloading ftp://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CTAN/systems/win32/miktex/tm/packages/bosisio.tar.lzma... 485588 bytes, 216.83 KB/Sec extracting files from bosisio.tar.lzma... However, the directory is still empty. Any suggestions? Best regards, Jose Carlos Santos |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2010-04-19 11:05:34
|
am Montag, 19. April 2010 um 11:19 schrieb José Carlos Santos: > Hi all, > Today, I tried to compile a LaTeX file which used the evenpage package, > which is part of the Bosisio macro package. I got an error message > saying that the file evenpage.sty could not be found. Then I decided to > see whether or not I had a directory > /tex/latex/bosisio > within the MiKTeX 2.8 directory and it turned out that I did have it, > but it was empty. Then I ran the Package Manager (as administrator), > according to which the macro package Bosisio was installed. So, I > uninstalled and then I installed it again. Apparently, all went well; I > got this information: > lightweight database digest: 3ac44d0d5cae18e9528adfdf02e2bf79 > going to download 485588 bytes > going to install 19 file(s) (1 package(s)) > downloading > ftp://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CTAN/systems/win32/miktex/tm/packages/bosisio.tar.lzma... > 485588 bytes, 216.83 KB/Sec > extracting files from bosisio.tar.lzma... > However, the directory is still empty. > Any suggestions? Well errors happen. Make a bug report on the miktex page that the package has not been packaged correctly. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ulrike Fischer |
From: José C. S. <jcs...@fc...> - 2010-04-19 13:00:09
|
On 19-04-2010 12:05, Ulrike Fischer wrote: >> Today, I tried to compile a LaTeX file which used the evenpage package, >> which is part of the Bosisio macro package. I got an error message >> saying that the file evenpage.sty could not be found. Then I decided to >> see whether or not I had a directory > >> /tex/latex/bosisio > >> within the MiKTeX 2.8 directory and it turned out that I did have it, >> but it was empty. Then I ran the Package Manager (as administrator), >> according to which the macro package Bosisio was installed. So, I >> uninstalled and then I installed it again. Apparently, all went well; I >> got this information: > >> lightweight database digest: 3ac44d0d5cae18e9528adfdf02e2bf79 >> going to download 485588 bytes >> going to install 19 file(s) (1 package(s)) >> downloading >> ftp://mirrors.ircam.fr/pub/CTAN/systems/win32/miktex/tm/packages/bosisio.tar.lzma... >> 485588 bytes, 216.83 KB/Sec >> extracting files from bosisio.tar.lzma... > >> However, the directory is still empty. > >> Any suggestions? > > Well errors happen. Make a bug report on the miktex page that the > package has not been packaged correctly. I listed the contents of the file bososio.tar.lzma and I got this: texmf/ texmf/doc/ texmf/doc/latex/ texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/ texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/accenti.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/accenti.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/dblfont.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/dblfont.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/envmath.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/envmath.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/evenpage.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/evenpage.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/graphfig.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/graphfig.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/index.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/mathcmd.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/mathcmd.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/quotes.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/quotes.pdf texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/README texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/sobolev.html texmf/doc/latex/bosisio/sobolev.pdf texmf/source/ texmf/source/bosisio-src.tar.bz2 texmf/source/latex/ texmf/source/latex/bosisio/ texmf/tpm/ texmf/tpm/packages/ texmf/tpm/packages/bosisio.tpm So, you were right: it was not packaged correctly. I have already make a bug report: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2989338&group_id=10783&atid=110783 but I don't feel very optimistic about it. The last time I made a bug report was 3 months ago: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110783&aid=2934840&group_id=10783 and nothing was done about it so far. Best regards, Jose Carlos Santos |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2010-04-19 13:45:49
|
am Montag, 19. April 2010 um 14:59 schrieb José Carlos Santos: > So, you were right: it was not packaged correctly. I have already make a > bug report: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2989338&group_id=10783&atid=110783 > but I don't feel very optimistic about it. The last time I made a bug > report was 3 months ago: > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110783&aid=2934840&group_id=10783 > and nothing was done about it so far. In general package errors are corrected quite fast. And if you need the package badly it is always possible to install it manually ... -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Ulrike Fischer |
From: José C. S. <jcs...@fc...> - 2010-04-19 13:57:59
|
On 19-04-2010 14:45, Ulrike Fischer wrote: >> So, you were right: it was not packaged correctly. I have already make a >> bug report: > >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2989338&group_id=10783&atid=110783 > >> but I don't feel very optimistic about it. The last time I made a bug >> report was 3 months ago: > >> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110783&aid=2934840&group_id=10783 > >> and nothing was done about it so far. > > In general package errors are corrected quite fast. And if you need > the package badly it is always possible to install it manually ... I know, but I don't need it *that* badly. :-) Best regards, Jose Carlos Santos |
From: Josef K. <jos...@gm...> - 2010-04-19 15:25:12
|
Am 19.04.2010 15:57, schrieb José Carlos Santos: > On 19-04-2010 14:45, Ulrike Fischer wrote: > >>> So, you were right: it was not packaged correctly. I have already make a >>> bug report: >> >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2989338&group_id=10783&atid=110783 >> >>> but I don't feel very optimistic about it. The last time I made a bug >>> report was 3 months ago: >> >>> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=110783&aid=2934840&group_id=10783 >> >>> and nothing was done about it so far. >> >> In general package errors are corrected quite fast. And if you need >> the package badly it is always possible to install it manually ... > > I know, but I don't need it *that* badly. :-) It's already updated! But i guess it will take a night to reach the mirrors. Josef -- Keine Sicherheit ohne Schäuble: GNUPG/PGP-Key unter http://www.josef-kleber.de/pgp/Josef_Kleber.asc DSA 1024 / 0x0FE9F849 / F3D1 5FD4 DC89 E519 62CF F7EF 5BD7 026B 0FE9 F849 |