From: Ariovaldo V G. <gar...@gm...> - 2007-08-30 12:30:12
|
Dear all I need to install the MikTex 2.6 system in a PC (WinXP) that is not connected to the internet. I would like to know if it is possible to dowload the MikTex2.6 (complete) and then save it in a CD or DVD. Thank you Ariovaldo. |
From: Martin S. <sch...@gm...> - 2007-08-30 12:53:33
|
Ariovaldo V Garcia schrieb: > Dear all > > I need to install the MikTex 2.6 system in a PC (WinXP) that is not connected to > the internet. I would like to know if it is possible to dowload the > MikTex2.6 (complete) > and then save it in a CD or DVD. > > Thank you > > Ariovaldo. > Yes, that is possible. A CD be used as repository as well. Bye Martin |
From: <nc...@fi...> - 2007-08-30 13:23:34
|
Ariovaldo V Garcia escribió: > Dear all > > I need to install the MikTex 2.6 system in a PC (WinXP) that is not connected to > the internet. I would like to know if it is possible to dowload the > > [...] Hello Ariovaldo. You can use wget to download the packages, burn them onto a CD or DVD and install from there on your not connected box. I did that. If you need help with the wget program write to me using yomi (at) adinet.com.uy. Do you speak Spanish? I'm from Uruguay. Good luck, kind regards.- -- -= Nicolás Conde - SS.AA. =- -= Facultad de Ingeniería =- -= Universidad de la República =- -= Montevideo - R.O. del Uruguay =- |
From: Cornelius C. N. <no...@it...> - 2007-08-30 17:46:18
|
I have MikTeX 2.6 installed (on a Win XP). In the settings menu for Formats, the only formats NOT excluded are etex latex mf mpost and, of course, tex I have updated the formats and refreshed the FNDB, and everything went flawlessly, as expected. But when I run a LaTeX compilation (with a command line calling miktex\bin\latex), the lof file says "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) ..." Is this imply a notational mistake, or is MikTeX actually running pdfTeX) which I DON'T want it to do!) ?? ccn. -- ................................................................. Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack ................................................................. |
From: Martin S. <sch...@gm...> - 2007-08-30 17:50:21
|
Cornelius C. Noack schrieb: > I have MikTeX 2.6 installed (on a Win XP). In the settings menu > for Formats, the only formats NOT excluded are > etex > latex > mf > mpost and, of course, > tex > > I have updated the formats and refreshed the FNDB, and everything > went flawlessly, as expected. > > But when I run a LaTeX compilation (with a command line calling > miktex\bin\latex), the lof file says > > "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) > (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) ..." > > Is this imply a notational mistake, or is MikTeX actually running > pdfTeX) which I DON'T want it to do!) ?? > > ccn. > Well, I guess you misunderstood something. "latex" as well as "pdflatex" are just user commands to run "pdfetex" in a specific mode. That's the correct way. What is the problem with that? What did you expect? Bye Martin |
From: Cornelius C. N. <no...@it...> - 2007-08-30 19:00:45
|
On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Martin Sievers wrote: > Cornelius C. Noack schrieb: >> I have MikTeX 2.6 installed (on a Win XP). In the settings menu >> for Formats, the only formats NOT excluded are >> etex >> latex >> mf >> mpost and, of course, >> tex >> >> I have updated the formats and refreshed the FNDB, and everything >> went flawlessly, as expected. >> >> But when I run a LaTeX compilation (with a command line calling >> miktex\bin\latex), the lof file says >> >> "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) >> (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) ..." >> >> Is this imply a notational mistake, or is MikTeX actually running >> pdfTeX) which I DON'T want it to do!) ?? >> >> ccn. >> > Well, I guess you misunderstood something. "latex" as well as "pdflatex" > are just user commands to run "pdfetex" in a specific mode. That's the > correct way. What is the problem with that? What did you expect? > > Bye > Martin > > (cut) > Thanks, Francois, for the quick answer, giving me the link: http://dojo.miktex.org/blogs/christian_schenk/archive/2006/05/16/ 488.aspx The extensive discussion there shows that indeed there are others with the same problem that I have, and so I maintain that the log file saying "This is pdfLaTeX" is really misleading when its's actually the pdfLaTeX engine running in LateX --> DVI mode only. ccn. -- ................................................................. Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack ................................................................. |
From: <pet...@fr...> - 2007-08-30 19:08:44
|
Cornelius C. Noack a =E9crit le 30/08/2007 20:59 : > On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Martin Sievers wrote: >=20 >> Cornelius C. Noack schrieb: >>> I have MikTeX 2.6 installed (on a Win XP). In the settings menu >>> for Formats, the only formats NOT excluded are >>> etex >>> latex >>> mf >>> mpost and, of course, >>> tex >>> >>> I have updated the formats and refreshed the FNDB, and everything >>> went flawlessly, as expected. >>> >>> But when I run a LaTeX compilation (with a command line calling >>> miktex\bin\latex), the lof file says >>> >>> "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) >>> (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) ..." >>> >>> Is this imply a notational mistake, or is MikTeX actually running >>> pdfTeX) which I DON'T want it to do!) ?? >>> >>> ccn. >>> >> Well, I guess you misunderstood something. "latex" as well as "pdflate= x" >> are just user commands to run "pdfetex" in a specific mode. That's the= >> correct way. What is the problem with that? What did you expect? >> >> Bye >> Martin >> >> > (cut) >> > Thanks, Francois, for the quick answer, giving me the link: > http://dojo.miktex.org/blogs/christian_schenk/archive/2006/05/16/ > 488.aspx >=20 > The extensive discussion there shows that indeed there are others > with the same problem that I have, and so I maintain that the log file = > saying > "This is pdfLaTeX" > is really misleading when its's actually the pdfLaTeX engine > running in LateX --> DVI mode only. >=20 > ccn. But the log is : "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) ..." The important point is "preloaded format=3Dlatex" F. P=E9tiard |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2007-08-31 07:03:58
|
am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 um 21:08 schrieb P=E9tiard Fran=E7ois: > But the log is : > "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) > (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) ..." Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? I have for LaTeX This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 and for pdfLaTeX This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) (preloaded format=3Dpdflatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:02 --=20 Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Ulrike Fischer mailto:li...@ni... |
From: Hans F. N. <Han...@hi...> - 2007-08-31 10:30:13
|
* Ulrike Fischer <li...@ni...> [2007-08-31]: > am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 um 21:08 schrieb Pétiard François: > > > > But the log is : > > > "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) > > (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) ..." > > Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? > > I have for LaTeX > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=latex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 > > and for pdfLaTeX > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=pdflatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:02 Ulrike, you have been too clever :-) You have both MiKTeX 2.5 and 2.6 installed, right? Well, you have forgotten to update %PATH% so it still points to the MiKTeX 2.5 binaries: > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) ^^^^^^^^^^^ By the way, I have This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.4 (MiKTeX 2.6) which just means that I have updated more recently than Pétiard. pdfeTeX is the default and hence has been renamed to pdfTeX. There old non-enhanced (or is it extended?) pdfTeX is gone from MiKTeX. Hans |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2007-08-31 11:06:01
|
am Freitag, 31. August 2007 um 11:27 schrieb Hans F. Nordhaug: >> Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? >>=20 >> I have for LaTeX >>=20 >> This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) >> (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 >>=20 > Ulrike, you have been too clever :-) You have both MiKTeX 2.5 and 2.6 > installed, right? No. I still have everywhere MiKTeX 2.5 ;-). I'm a lazy updater. I don't have much time currently and so prefer to stay until I really need some features of 2.6. But I like to know and understand the differences between the versions. That will help when I update. > By the way, I have=20 > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.4 (MiKTeX 2.6) > which just means that I have updated more recently than P=E9tiard. > pdfeTeX is the default and hence has been renamed to pdfTeX. There old > non-enhanced (or is it extended?) pdfTeX is gone from MiKTeX. Thanks. I didn't know that. --=20 Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Ulrike Fischer mailto:li...@ni... |
From: George N. W. I. <gn...@gm...> - 2007-08-31 10:34:46
|
On 8/31/07, Ulrike Fischer <li...@ni...> wrote: > am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 um 21:08 schrieb P=E9tiard Fran=E7ois: > > > > But the log is : > > > "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) > > (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) ..." > > Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? Yes, then "entering extended mode". > I have for LaTeX > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 > > and for pdfLaTeX > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=3Dpdflatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:02 >From the NEWS file in the pdftex1.40 source package you can learn that pdftex now provides all the extensions. When you build pdftex-1.40 from source, pdfetex is just a copy, so on linux I see: $ pdfetex --version pdfTeX 3.141592-1.40.5-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.6) I assume MiKTeX's pdftex-1.40 (e.g., in ver. 2.6) is the same. --=20 George N. White III <aa...@ch...> Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia |
From: Cornelius C. N. <no...@it...> - 2007-08-31 10:41:26
|
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Ulrike Fischer wrote: > am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 um 21:08 schrieb Pétiard François: > > >> But the log is : > >> "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) >> (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) ..." > > Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? > > I have for LaTeX > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=latex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 > > and for pdfLaTeX > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=pdflatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:02 > I just checked again: it says "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) 30 AUG 2007 23:21" I guess the difference is due to the fact that I excluded pdfetex explicitly in my MikTeX 2.6 format settings. ccn. -- ................................................................. Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack ................................................................. |
From: George N. W. I. <gn...@gm...> - 2007-08-30 21:14:47
|
On 8/30/07, Cornelius C. Noack <no...@it...> wrote: > Thanks, Francois, for the quick answer, giving me the link: > http://dojo.miktex.org/blogs/christian_schenk/archive/2006/05/16/ > 488.aspx > > The extensive discussion there shows that indeed there are others > with the same problem that I have, and so I maintain that the log > file saying > "This is pdfLaTeX" "This is pdfTeX" > is really misleading when its's actually the pdfLaTeX engine > running in LateX --> DVI mode only. It is less misleading to show the actual program that is being used. The confusion comes because many people have mistakenly assumed that tex<>dvi and pdftex<->pdf output exclusively, which resulted in widespread use of macros that hide the assumption where it is difficult to find. Such macros tend to lurk on disks and reappear long after the maintained version has been updated in the major distributions. It is no surprise that this change causes problems for users, but at the time nobody was able to come up with a sensible way to avoid them. Of course developers always say "read the manual", but in practice there are times when reading the manual is more important than others. Maybe in addition to the common "accept the license (yes or no)" panel there should be a small exam "pdftex can produce dvi output (yes or no)" that must answered correctly before the new software is installed. -- George N. White III <aa...@ch...> Head of St. Margarets Bay, Nova Scotia |
From: <Ral...@t-...> - 2007-08-31 10:24:05
|
Hi, > Ariovaldo V Garcia escribi=F3: > >> Dear all >> >> I need to install the MikTex 2.6 system in a PC (WinXP) that is not = connected to >> the internet. I would like to know if it is possible to dowload the >> >> [...] > > Hello Ariovaldo. > You can use wget to download the packages, burn them onto a CD or = DVD and install from there > on your not connected box. I did that. > If you need help with the wget program write to me using yomi (at) = adinet.com.uy. > Do you speak Spanish? I'm from Uruguay. > Good luck, kind regards.- is there a list of FTP servers/mirros where MiKTeX can be downloaded. = The proposed way to fetch the download manager and use them to get the = packages on a local drive does not work for those behind a firewall = (which will not be changed). Regards Ralf |
From: Ariovaldo V G. <gar...@gm...> - 2007-09-03 12:38:02
|
Hi, Thanks to all that have replied to my question. Ariovaldo On 8/31/07, Ral...@t-... <Ral...@t-...> wrote= : > Hi, > > > Ariovaldo V Garcia escribi=F3: > > > >> Dear all > >> > >> I need to install the MikTex 2.6 system in a PC (WinXP) that is not co= nnected to > >> the internet. I would like to know if it is possible to dowload the > >> > >> [...] > > > > Hello Ariovaldo. > > You can use wget to download the packages, burn them onto a CD or DV= D and install from there > > on your not connected box. I did that. > > If you need help with the wget program write to me using yomi (at) a= dinet.com.uy. > > Do you speak Spanish? I'm from Uruguay. > > Good luck, kind regards.- > > is there a list of FTP servers/mirros where MiKTeX can be downloaded. The= proposed way to fetch the download manager and use them to get the package= s on a local drive does not work for those behind a firewall (which will no= t be changed). > > Regards > > Ralf > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > MiKTeX-Users mailing list > MiK...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/miktex-users > |
From: <pet...@fr...> - 2007-08-30 17:57:51
|
Cornelius C. Noack a =E9crit le 30/08/2007 19:45 : > I have MikTeX 2.6 installed (on a Win XP). In the settings menu > for Formats, the only formats NOT excluded are > etex > latex > mf > mpost and, of course, > tex >=20 > I have updated the formats and refreshed the FNDB, and everything > went flawlessly, as expected. >=20 > But when I run a LaTeX compilation (with a command line calling=20 > miktex\bin\latex), the lof file says >=20 > "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) > (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) ..." >=20 > Is this imply a notational mistake, or is MikTeX actually running > pdfTeX) which I DON'T want it to do!) ?? >=20 > ccn. See : http://dojo.miktex.org/blogs/christian_schenk/archive/2006/05/16/488.aspx= F. P=E9tiard |
From: <pet...@fr...> - 2007-08-31 12:32:57
|
Ulrike Fischer a =E9crit le 31/08/2007 09:03 : > am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 um 21:08 schrieb P=E9tiard Fran=E7ois: >=20 >=20 >> But the log is : >=20 >> "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) >> (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) ..." >=20 > Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? >=20 > I have for LaTeX >=20 > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=3Dlatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 >=20 > and for pdfLaTeX >=20 > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > (preloaded format=3Dpdflatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:02 >=20 I've updated MiKTeX that night and now I have : This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.4 (MiKTeX 2.6) (preloaded=20 format=3Dlatex 2007.8.30) 31 AUG 2007 12:44 entering extended mode **test.tex =2E.. Even if I compile with the option -quiet, I have always "entering=20 extended mode". Why ? F. P=E9tiard |
From: Cornelius C. N. <no...@it...> - 2007-08-31 13:18:52
|
I apologize for this non-MikTeX question; I somehow haven't managed to post mail to comp.text.tex ... I have a medium-sized text with many index references and use the index.sty package (by David Jones). After adding a fair amount of \index{foo} inputs without problems, LaTeX suddenly (meaning: I don't understand why) complains with ! LaTeX Error: Index type `default' undefined. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. Neither manual (nor the index.pdf itself) says anything about that. I call the index package by \usepackage{index} and the index references themselves by \index{foo} or \index*{foo} , all in the standard way. What's the "default index type" that LaTeX wants to see defined ??? I am sorry I can't give 'a minimal example'; when I shrink my file to such a minimum, the error disappears. Is there anybody who understands what is happening here ? ccn. -- ................................................................. Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack ................................................................. |
From: Ulrike F. <li...@ni...> - 2007-08-31 14:18:27
|
am Freitag, 31. August 2007 um 15:18 schrieb Cornelius C. Noack: > I apologize for this non-MikTeX question; I somehow haven't > managed to post mail to comp.text.tex ... Don't answer to another question (and simply change the subject) if you have a new question. That messes threading up. Always make a new message. > I have a medium-sized text with many index references and use the > index.sty package (by David Jones). > After adding a fair amount of \index{foo} inputs without problems, > LaTeX suddenly (meaning: I don't understand why) complains with > ! LaTeX Error: Index type `default' undefined. > See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation. > Neither manual (nor the index.pdf itself) says anything about that. But index.pdf mentions "default". > I call the index package by > \usepackage{index} > and the index references themselves by > \index{foo} or \index*{foo} > , all in the standard way. > What's the "default index type" that LaTeX wants to see defined ??? > I am sorry I can't give 'a minimal example'; when I shrink my file > to such a minimum, the error disappears. A minimal example is the smallest example that demonstrates the problem. So it is always possible to make one. > Is there anybody who understands what is happening here ? You probably deleted \makeindex. Or put it between braces. --=20 Mit freundlichen Gr=FC=DFen Ulrike Fischer mailto:li...@ni... |
From: Cornelius C. N. <no...@it...> - 2007-08-31 14:07:02
|
Sorry about asking a LaTeX question here; I somehow can't login properly with comp-text.tex ... I use the index package (by David Jones) and get errors with it that I don't understand: -- ................................................................. Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack ................................................................. |
From: Cornelius C. N. <no...@it...> - 2007-08-31 16:02:06
|
> Sorry about asking a LaTeX question here; I somehow can't login > properly with comp-text.tex ... > > I use the index package (by David Jones) and get errors with it > that I don't understand: and secondly, my mail seems ro have been truncated totally in the sending process! So here is my second try: I am using the index package (by David Jones) in a medium-sized paper, with lots of index entries. These look to completely standard: \index{foo} and \index*{foo} the preamble entry is \usepackage{index} I have turned '\shortindexingoff' . This works as expected for a while; but then, after some length of text (and number of \index entries), LaTeX suddenly (meaning: I don't understand why) complains: "! LaTeX Error: Index type `default' undefined. See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation." Neither manual gives any hint what a "default index type" might mean, and neither does index.pdf. I might add that, as this manuscript has to do with MusiXTeX, there are lengthy stretches of straight TeX parts, enclosed in "\begin{music} ... \end{music}" . I a pretty sure my problem has got something to do with that, but I have failed completely with understanding what's going on. Does anybody have an idea? ccn. PS: Sorry, but I can't provide 'a minimal working example that exhibits the error' because I can't locate the exact source (LaTeX stops without further hints as to where the error actually originates). Of course, I am happy to send the complete 400 KB source to anybody who is willing to look at it ... -- ................................................................. Prof.Dr. Cornelius C. Noack Phones: Inst. f. Theor. Physik FB 1 office : +49 (421) 218-2427 Universit"at Bremen secretary: -2422 Otto-Hahn-Allee Fax : -4869 D - 28334 Bremen home : +49 (421) 34 22 36 Fax: 346 7872 E-mail: noack at itp.uni-bremen.de or ccnoack at mailaps.org WWW-page: www.itp.uni-bremen.de/~noack ................................................................. |
From: Hans F. N. <Han...@hi...> - 2007-08-31 16:17:43
|
* Pétiard François <pet...@fr...> [2007-08-31]: > Ulrike Fischer a écrit le 31/08/2007 09:03 : > > am Donnerstag, 30. August 2007 um 21:08 schrieb Pétiard François: > > > > > >> But the log is : > > > >> "This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.3 (MiKTeX 2.6) > >> (preloaded format=latex 2007.8.30) ..." > > > > Does it really say pdfTeX? Doesn't MikTeX 2.6. use pdfeTeX? > > > > I have for LaTeX > > > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > > (preloaded format=latex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:00 > > > > and for pdfLaTeX > > > > This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.30.6-2.2 (MiKTeX 2.5) > > (preloaded format=pdflatex 2007.5.29) 31 AUG 2007 09:02 > > > > I've updated MiKTeX that night and now I have : > > This is pdfTeX, Version 3.141592-1.40.4 (MiKTeX 2.6) (preloaded > format=latex 2007.8.30) 31 AUG 2007 12:44 > entering extended mode > **test.tex > ... > > Even if I compile with the option -quiet, I have always "entering > extended mode". Why ? Because. It's a bug and it has been known to the MiKTeX developer since February 2004 - see http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=887142&group_id=10783&atid=360783 Hans |
From: Christian S. <cs...@mi...> - 2007-08-31 19:05:11
|
Hans F. Nordhaug wrote: > * Pétiard François <pet...@fr...> [2007-08-31]: >> Even if I compile with the option -quiet, I have always "entering >> extended mode". Why ? > > Because. > > It's a bug and it has been known to the MiKTeX developer since February 2004 - see > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=887142&group_id=10783&atid=360783 Thank you for the reminder :-) Now (next update) fixed in MiKTeX 2.7 (I do not want to touch 2.6 at the moment). -Christian |