From: Miller, M. (Rosetta) <Michael_Miller@Rosettabio.com> - 2003-01-19 20:23:09
|
Hi All, For software that is going to import MAGE files, I think it's going to be important that the software can know from the file itself how it was produced, so it can know what mappings were used. For instance, some feature extraction software will have different SpecializedQuantitationTypes that might be of interest to the application. It may be more general, such as the Affymetrix Exporter. So that software can know up front what's coming, I'd like to suggest the following convention be used, <MAGE-ML identifier="{IDENTIFIER PREFIX}:sample_profile"> <Descriptions_assnlist> <!-- Specifies who/what defined mappings used for the file --> <Description text="Production and Mapping Information" URI="{where documentation of mapping located}"> <Annotations_assnlist> <OntologyEntry category="Producer" value="Acme Feature Extraction" /> <OntologyEntry category="Version" value="1.2" /> </Annotations_assnlist> </Description> </Descriptions_assnlist> <AuditTrail_assnlist> <!-- Specifies who created the file and when --> <Audit date="yyyy-MM-dd hh:mm:ss.SSSSSS" action="creation"> <Performer_assnref> <!-- Could be Organization_ref --> <Person_ref identifier = "{IDENTIFIER PREFIX}:Doe, John" /> </Performer_assnref> </Audit> </AuditTrail_assnlist> <!-- rest of file --> </MAGE-ML> Comments, additions, subtractions? thanks, Michael Michael Miller Senior Application Developer Rosetta Biosoftware mic...@ro... www.rosettabio.com |