#2 gcc-3.2

[Davy Durham]

It would be good for you to try compiling all three of
your mffm related packages with gcc-3.2 and work out
the compiler issues/warnings.

I've just about got it compiling now.

[Davy Durham]

Logged In: YES
user_id=28588

Perhaps it was conflicts with glibc-2.2.5 that also caused
some of the issues I had (like pow() is overloaded for
double and float and somewhere you were passing two ints and
it complained about an ambiguous function call (because it
didn't know which one you wanted to use))

[Davy Durham]

Logged In: YES
user_id=28588

Also, I had to move $(LIBS) to after the .C file on the
compile line to make the library order correct.. I'm not
sure how it has worked for you before other than it just
did. For library order, properly (and I've experienced this
on the Solaris platform as well), the library that is
depended on should be listed on the command line after the
lib or .C file that depends on it. If there is a circular
dependancy within the libraries then one of them should be
listed twice on the command line (once before and once after
the other lib)

[Matt Flax]

Logged In: YES
user_id=67246

I am not quite sure which of the packages you are referring
to. If you are talking about the timecode, fft and WSOLA
combination, then that is what I use. gnu gcc-3.2
I get very few warnings and no errors.
I have not tested it with many architectures, but I envisage
little or no problems.