On Saturday 06 January 2007 09:59, Giorgio Lando wrote:
> Thank you! I will try it. Actually I need to update my SA.
> As for the first bug, here I am able to use 4 facilities in one rule
> without that error, just the fifth determines it.
as i said, it's not really deterministic ... many factors decide when the=20
thing will actually crash
if you look at the code, you'd see that starting with the 2nd facitlity,=20
metalog would start clobbering memory it didnt allocate
> Probably, once fixed this problem, 0.8 could be released.
for sure, i need to fix the hangs in the signal handlers ... that's a prett=
y=20
nasty bug (if you use a command directive, there's a not-too-hard-to-trigge=
r=20
race condition which would hang metalog and thus hang anything that tried t=
o=20
do syslog())
=2Dmike
|
