Thank you! I will try it. Actually I need to update my SA.
As for the first bug, here I am able to use 4 facilities in one rule without
that error, just the fifth determines it. May be that mixing different kinds
of directives things change (depending from the "complexity" of directives?
But I am going to try your fix.
Probably, once fixed this problem, 0.8 could be released.
Giorgio Lando
On 07:53 Sat 06 Jan , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 06 January 2007 07:45, Giorgio Lando wrote:
> > 1) if you assign more than four directives in a rule
>
> actually, the bug was if you had more than 1 ... glibc just didnt tend to
> catch it until you overwrote even more memory
>
> i fixed this in svn in the last hour ;)
>
> > 2) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26694
> > I can reproduce this one, but I understand that it can be considered
> > independent of metalog.
>
> you can reproduce it with older versions of SA or with the latest ones ?
> upstream bug report indicates they werent properly calling openlog() but the
> latest code does, so it should work
> http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3052
> -mike
|
