On Saturday 06 January 2007 07:45, Giorgio Lando wrote:
> 1) if you assign more than four directives in a rule
actually, the bug was if you had more than 1 ... glibc just didnt tend to=20
catch it until you overwrote even more memory
i fixed this in svn in the last hour ;)
> 2) http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D26694
> I can reproduce this one, but I understand that it can be considered
> independent of metalog.
you can reproduce it with older versions of SA or with the latest ones ? =20
upstream bug report indicates they werent properly calling openlog() but th=
e=20
latest code does, so it should work
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=3D3052
=2Dmike
|