|
From: Bill P. <pa...@ki...> - 2014-01-14 19:25:28
|
Hi Dave, On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:17 AM, David Arnett wrote: > I am inclined to the view that the Asplund abundances are correct and the stellar models are wrong, but that is just my opinion. perhaps in stellar modeling 2 wrongs can make a right. ;D such as "wrong" abundances + "wrong" mixing + fine tuning => "right" solar model? so improving one thing can make the output worse! not necessarily what's going on here of course, but always need to keep it in mind as a possibility. -B |