[Mc4j-development] [ mc4j-Bugs-934673 ] JSR160 vs. MX4J 2.x Connection confusion
Brought to you by:
ghinkl
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-04-14 02:35:49
|
Bugs item #934673, was opened at 2004-04-13 21:35 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493495&aid=934673&group_id=60228 Category: Connections Group: MC4J 1.2b5 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Greg Hinkle (ghinkl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: JSR160 vs. MX4J 2.x Connection confusion Initial Comment: The choice of connection types is confusing given that MX4J now has standardized on the JSR160 style connector type. The connections should be described or renamed to be more like {MX4J 1.x}, {JSR 160} /{MX4J 2.x}. Maybe just a message that pops up when you select each of the connection types. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493495&aid=934673&group_id=60228 |