Re: Re: [Mc4j-development] port to NetBeans 3.6?

[<rbr...@co...>]

Greg,

Nice job! I downloaded and it worked great without a problem (used the windows exe install - haven't tried to compile the source yet). The new version looks very nice as well.

FYI - My configuration is:

WinXP Pro
JDK 1.4.2_03
JBoss 3.2.3

Rich

> From: Greg Hinkle <gh...@sa...>
> Date: 2004/02/19 Thu PM 06:56:27 EST
> To: 'Mc4...@li...' <mc4...@li...>
> Subject: Re: [Mc4j-development] port to NetBeans 3.6?
> 
> Well. I just had to give it a try... so I upgraded to NB 3.6 last night 
> and got pretty much everything working. The installer class is no 
> longer used... The new Windows2 layering system is used to install the 
> MC4J components into the platform.
> 
> The new 1.2b4 just released has this work in it. There will probably be 
> a few quirks with it though so let me know if anyone has any problems.
> 
> 
> On Feb 17, 2004, at 4:43 PM, Gregory Hinkle wrote:
> 
> > Hi Rich. I haven't yet gotten a chance to look into 3.6 issues. Now 
> > that
> > I've consolidated it back into a single netbeans module I think its 
> > time
> > to move back to the xml layer based deployment instead of the hacked
> > module installer class I'm using today. The last time I tried this I 
> > did
> > have some trouble getting it to work... and the documentation was a bit
> > weak at the time. I'll take a look soon too...
> >
> > Still need to hammer out a few bugs with the b3 release. Having a bit 
> > of
> > trouble with jmx remoting over ssl, but hoping to release in a day or
> > two.
> >
> > Greg Hinkle
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: mc4...@li...
> > [mailto:mc4...@li...] On Behalf Of
> > rbr...@co...
> > Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:33 PM
> > To: mc4...@li...
> > Subject: [Mc4j-development] port to NetBeans 3.6?
> >
> > I compiled and tried to run the Nov 2003 release under NetBeans 3.6
> > release and got the application to startup but the MC4J module aborted
> > at load/start time. I was considering looking at the mods necessary 
> > over
> > the weekend but didn't want to waste time if you've already addressed
> > them in the next release or if there are substantial changes.
> >
> > Greg, can you let me know what the timeframe is for the next release 
> > you
> > mentioned last week and if looking into NB 3.6 would be a waste prior 
> > to
> > the release.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Rich
> >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mc4j-development mailing list
> > Mc4...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mc4j-development
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> > Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> > a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mc4j-development mailing list
> > Mc4...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mc4j-development
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now.
> Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with
> a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now!
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id56&alloc_id438&op=click
> _______________________________________________
> Mc4j-development mailing list
> Mc4...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mc4j-development
>