Bugs item #934673, was opened at 2004-04-13 21:35
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ghinkl
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493495&aid=934673&group_id=60228
Category: Connections
Group: MC4J 1.2b5
>Status: Pending
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Greg Hinkle (ghinkl)
>Assigned to: Greg Hinkle (ghinkl)
Summary: JSR160 vs. MX4J 2.x Connection confusion
Initial Comment:
The choice of connection types is confusing given that
MX4J now has standardized on the JSR160 style
connector type.
The connections should be described or renamed to be
more like {MX4J 1.x}, {JSR 160} /{MX4J 2.x}. Maybe
just a message that pops up when you select each of
the connection types.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
>Comment By: Greg Hinkle (ghinkl)
Date: 2004-04-21 20:18
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=773314
I have added a message field to the connection panel to
warn mx4j 2.x users to use the jsr 160 connection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=493495&aid=934673&group_id=60228
|
