Licence confusion
About MayWeb is a lightweight, beautifully designed local development
Brought to you by:
hosted25
Originally created by: davorg
In your README, you say:
MayWeb is licensed under the MIT License.
But the licence file included in the repo is the Apache Licence (version 2).
You should pick a licence and stick with it (and what's the point of using an open source licence on a project with no source code?)
Originally posted by: davorg
I see you've now removed all references to either the MIT or Apache licences. If it's proprietary software, then how did those licences get there?
Originally posted by: oyin25
Yes the reason for the License confusion was because i use copilot to write the README AND FORAMATED IT FOR ME