From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-03-07 19:52:08
|
Bugs item #1676034, was opened at 2007-03-07 13:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1676034&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Lisp Core - Taylor Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Barton Willis (willisbl) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Taylor leaves gensyms in answer Initial Comment: (%i4) integrate(integrate(f(x,y),x,0,h),y,0,k); (%o4) integrate(integrate(f(x,y),x,0,h),y,0,k) (%i5) taylor(%,[h,k],[0,0],1); (%o5) at(integrate(integrate(f(x,y),x,0,h),y,0,k),g33544=0)+((at(integrate(f(h,y),y,0,k),g33544=0))*h+(at(integrate(f(x,k),x,0,h),g33544=0))*k)+... If 'at' went ahead and did the subs, maybe (%o5) would be OK? So maybe 'taylor' isn't the correct category. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=1676034&group_id=4933 |