From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2006-07-01 04:23:07
|
Bugs item #640332, was opened at 2002-11-18 14:35 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by robert_dodier You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=640332&group_id=4933 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. >Category: Lisp Core Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stavros Macrakis (macrakis) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Need to specdisrep more systematically Initial Comment: There are lots of places where the Poisson representation isn't handled properly, and a few where Rat isn't handled properly. I'm not sure if anyone cares about Poisson representation, to tell the truth, but it would be nice if specrepcheck were used more consistently.... Of course, it would be even better if representation-specific routines were called, but we can start with specrepcheck. For example: diff(rat(x),rat(x)) => 1 OK but diff(x,rat(x)) => 0 BAD diff(intopois(U),U) => fatal error taylor(intopois(sin(U),U,0,3) => fatal error ratsimp(intopois(sin(U))) => internal error ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104933&aid=640332&group_id=4933 |