|
From: Richard G. <ric...@us...> - 2026-09-02 21:58:50
|
--- **[bugs:#5218] Einhil.dem seems to have index issues** **Status:** open **Group:** None **Created:** Wed Sep 02, 2026 09:58 PM UTC by Richard Gobeli **Last Updated:** Wed Sep 02, 2026 09:58 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody The D expression does not simplify. This is D. -((5*g([],[%1,%2])*g([],[%3,%4])*g([%1,%4],[],n)*g([%3,m],[],%2))/4)+(g([],[%1,%2])*g([],[%3,%4])*g([%1,n],[],m)*g([%3,%4],[],%2))/2-(g([],[%1,%2])*g([],[%3,%4])*g([%2,m],[],n)*g([%3,%4],[],%1))/2+(5*g([],[%1,%2])*g([],[%3,%4])*g([%1,n],[],%4)*g([%3,%2],[],m))/4-g([],[%1,%2],%2,m)*g([%1,n],[])+g([],[%1,%2],%2,n)*g([%1,m],[]) Is this correct? The two terms at the end should cancel due to the symmetry of g and contraction. It needs to contract g with the derivative indices first, so the derivatives are gone, and then it can use the symmetry of g to cancel them. This term -g([],[%1,%2],%2,m) times g([%1,n],[]) needs to be -g([m,n],[]) otherwise, it becomes -g([],[],m,n), which makes no sense for symmetry. --- Sent from sourceforge.net because max...@li... is subscribed to https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/bugs/ To unsubscribe from further messages, a project admin can change settings at https://sourceforge.net/p/maxima/admin/bugs/options. Or, if this is a mailing list, you can unsubscribe from the mailing list. |