|
From: Stavros M. <mac...@gm...> - 2025-07-07 22:03:19
|
Ah, that does look terrible. I guess the idea was that command-like symbols (plot_format, grid, etc.) would be highlighted differently from arguments. But why are box and triangle in command color? I'm not a huge fan of syntax colorization, and if it's got to be done, why are we using such garish colors? Anyway, what I would prefer *instead* of coloring would be better indentation, to make it easy to see the structure. In this example: (%i1) set_plot_option ([grid, 30, 40]); (%o1) [[plot_format, gnuplot_pipes], [grid, 30, 40], [run_viewer, true], [axes, true], [nticks, 29], [adapt_depth, 5], [color, blue, red, green, magenta, black, cyan], [point_type, bullet, box, triangle, plus, times, asterisk], [palette, [gradient, green, cyan, blue, violet], [gradient, magenta, violet, blue, cyan, green, yellow, orange, red, brown, black]], [gnuplot_preamble, ], [gnuplot_term, default]] On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:52 PM Jaime Villate via Maxima-discuss < max...@li...> wrote: > > On 07/07/25 21:25, Raymond Toy wrote: > > On 7/7/25 12:48 PM, Jaime Villate via Maxima-discuss wrote: > > Hello, > > The syntax coloring in the HTML version of the manual seems very odd to > me. Some random keywords appear in red or blue. In my opinion, it would > look better without any coloring at all. > > Can you point out an example of this? > > Sure, look at the attachment. > > Regards, > > Jaime > _______________________________________________ > Maxima-discuss mailing list > Max...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss > |