|
From: Stavros M. <mac...@gm...> - 2025-07-07 22:00:06
|
Oops, premature send. will try again. On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 5:38 PM Stavros Macrakis <mac...@gm...> wrote: > Ah, that does look terrible. I guess the idea was that command-like > symbols (plot_format, grid, etc.) would be highlighted differently from > arguments. But why are box and triangle in command color? > > I'm not a huge fan of syntax colorization, and if it's got to be done, why > are we using such garish colors? > > Anyway, what I would prefer *instead* of coloring would be better > indentation, to make it easy to see the structure. In this example: > > (%i1) set_plot_option ([grid, 30, 40]); > (%o1) [[plot_format, gnuplot_pipes], [grid, 30, 40], > [run_viewer, true], [axes, true], [nticks, 29], [adapt_depth, 5], > [color, blue, red, green, magenta, black, cyan], > [point_type, bullet, box, triangle, plus, times, asterisk], > [palette, [gradient, green, cyan, blue, violet], > [gradient, magenta, violet, blue, cyan, green, yellow, orange, > red, brown, black]], [gnuplot_preamble, ], [gnuplot_term, default]] > > > On Mon, Jul 7, 2025 at 4:52 PM Jaime Villate via Maxima-discuss < > max...@li...> wrote: > >> >> On 07/07/25 21:25, Raymond Toy wrote: >> >> On 7/7/25 12:48 PM, Jaime Villate via Maxima-discuss wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> The syntax coloring in the HTML version of the manual seems very odd to >> me. Some random keywords appear in red or blue. In my opinion, it would >> look better without any coloring at all. >> >> Can you point out an example of this? >> >> Sure, look at the attachment. >> >> Regards, >> >> Jaime >> _______________________________________________ >> Maxima-discuss mailing list >> Max...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss >> > |