Re: [Maxima-discuss] Problem with draw2d(implicit(...))

[Leo B. <leo...@um...>]

Try f^(1/3); f vanishes to 4th order at (0,0) so the numerics are going
to be bad near there.

Leo

Michel Talon <ta...@lp...> writes:

> Hello,
>
> to do something with the quaratine, i am studying the chapter on
> resolution of singularities
>
> of algebraic curves in the book by Walker.  So i compute the various
> Puiseux series of the curve
>
> 2*x^5-x^3*y+2*x^2*y^2-x*y^3+2*y^5=0 and at the end i had the idea to
> plot this curve around (0,0)
>
> in order to see how the branches come together with
> draw2d(implicit(...)). To my surprise the drawing is completely
>
> wrong and does not even come close to (0,0) which is an obvious
> root. I cannot be more precise
>
> except joining the computation (with the plots in wxmaxima format)
>
> which can even be of help for people interested in the subject, but i
> would be happy if someone had an
>
> idea about this misbehaviour.