|
From: Kris K. <kat...@gm...> - 2018-05-30 19:03:48
|
On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:26:08AM +0000, Robert Dodier wrote: > On 2018-05-29, Kris Katterjohn <kat...@gm...> wrote: > > > That's kinda gross, but this way the new behavior is precisely like > > the current behavior when there are one or zero return values, it works > > in the desired way when there are two or more return values, and no case > > can be confused with the error case. So really the only difference is > > that we get all return values instead of just the primary one when there > > are two or more values. > > Sounds good to me. Keep up the good work! Thanks for taking the time to look at this and for the encouragement. It's appreciated. Cheers, Kris Katterjohn |