|
From: Andreas E. <aek...@gm...> - 2017-06-27 19:25:27
|
On Di 27 Jun 2017 at 07:44, Gunter Königsmann <gu...@pe...> wrote: > If the cause for the change is indeed the evaluation order my > next > question would be: Did the change increase the accuracy (after > all there > is no guarantee that the value originally contained in the > testbench was > even correct before the change)? And does it do so in the > majority of cases? I#m not really sure it is the evaluation order, but at the moment this is my best guess. I had to loosen the relatice error bounds for two test in rtest_gamma.mac from 5.9b-24 to 7.8b-24 and from 6.6b-25 to 8.3b-25 where fpprec was set to 24. The relevant change is in rpart.lisp in the function risplit-expt-sqrt-pow where the macros (1//2) and (half) were changed to the variable 1//2. Andreas -- ceterum censeo redmondinem esse delendam |