|
From: Gunter K. <gu...@pe...> - 2016-01-28 06:00:14
|
Arrgh! This sounded like I were to advocate for changing ceiling() and floor(), two functions I am actually happy with: They need more time than I first expected. But they do so for a reason that more than justifies this: They need this time in order to be able to return the correct result. Kind regards, Gunter. On 28.01.2016 06:47, Gunter Königsmann wrote: >> 1. Eh, not so fast? Would anyone notice the machine float speed in the >> blizzard >> of other operations surrounding each operation? > > I did recognize that ceiling() and floor() took - I think it was > actually milliseconds - on my I7 computer and therefore contacted the > mailing list after trying to apply floor() to 100 lists that were a > million elements long. > > Actually the overhead maxima normally imposes on complicated operations > currently under normal circumstances tends to be surprisingly low so > maxima currently is up to big numerical tasks. > > Kind regards, > > Gunter. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into Application Performance > APM + Mobile APM + RUM: Monitor 3 App instances at just $35/Month > Monitor end-to-end web transactions and take corrective actions now > Troubleshoot faster and improve end-user experience. Signup Now! > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=267308311&iu=/4140 > _______________________________________________ > Maxima-discuss mailing list > Max...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/maxima-discuss > |