Logged In: YES
user_id=501686
In 5.9.3cvs, ratweight(x,1.5) and ratweight(y,3/2) => no
error (as in initial report). However, after p:
sum(x^i,i,0,10), then rat(p),ratwtlvl:1 etc all yield /R/
x^10+x^9+x^8+x^7+x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 (not 0).
ratweights can currently only be integers, but there is
no check for this:
ratweight(x,1.5); -- no error
ratweight(y,3/2); -- no error
p: sum(x^i,i,0,10);
rat(p),ratwtlvl:1 => 0
rat(p),ratwtlvl:2 => 0
rat(p),ratwtlvl:10 => 0
rat(p),ratwtlvl:100 => 0
ratweight should give an error if the weight isn't integral.
Alternatively, fractional (rat and float) weights could be
supported. It wouldn't be that hard, though there would
be a bit of a performance hit. Most ratweight
manipulation is in ratout/wtptimesXXX, and uses f*. It
could use * or even MUL instead.
Logged In: YES
user_id=501686
In 5.9.3cvs, ratweight(x,1.5) and ratweight(y,3/2) => no
error (as in initial report). However, after p:
sum(x^i,i,0,10), then rat(p),ratwtlvl:1 etc all yield /R/
x^10+x^9+x^8+x^7+x^6+x^5+x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1 (not 0).
Log in to post a comment.