WxMaxima version: 26.01.0_MSW
Using wxWidgets version: wxWidgets 3.2.9
Maxima version: 5.49.0
Maxima build date: 2026-01-02 21:27:51
Host type: x86_64-w64-mingw32
System type: Win32 10.0.19041 X86-64
Lisp implementation type: SBCL
Lisp implementation version: 2.6.0
to be done whenever wxMaxima starts Maxima:
(assume_pos:true, file_output_append:true, ratprint:false, showtime:true, load(simplify_sum), intanalysis:false, simpsum:true, load("lrats"), letrat:true,ratfac:true, algebraic:true,rootsconmode=super, algexact:true,fpprintprec:4);
(kill(ff,x,dx,y,dy,t),ff:xsqrt(1-y^2)+ysqrt(1-x^2),t1:diff(ff,x)dx+diff(ff,y)dy,t2:(sqrt((1-x^2)(1-y^2))
-xy)*(dx/sqrt(1-x^2)+dy/sqrt(1-y^2)),disp(["t1"=t1,"t2"=t2]),t:radcan(t1-t2),disp(["t"=t]) );
At first run or after restart maxima the above does NOT give t=0 as it should. Though now if put in an extra assume... eg
(kill(ff,x,dx,y,dy,t),assume(x<1),ff:xsqrt(1-y^2)+ysqrt(1-x^2),t1:diff(ff,x)dx+diff(ff,y)dy,t2:(sqrt((1-x^2)(1-y^2)) -xy)*(dx/sqrt(1-x^2)+dy/sqrt(1-y^2)),disp(["t1"=t1,"t2"=t2]),t:radcan(t1-t2),disp(["t"=t]) );
Then sometimes it does give t=0 but not always. I do exactly the same thing and it sometimes does and sometimes does NOT give t=0. Now without writing the same things over again i just change the assume to assume(x>1) and again sometimes gives t=0 and sometimes not. And sometimes i have to do
assume(x<1,y<1) and again sometimes does or does not give t=0. sometimes have to use
assume(x<1,x>-1,y<1) before it gives t=0 and etc. .and if all else fails then must use assume(x<1,x>-1,y<1,y>-1) and that usually always works even though i recall once even that did not give t=0. I cannot figure why the inconsistency.
OK now here is the next issue. Whatever i had to put for the assume then i next take it out completely
and just put the original in again,
(kill(ff,x,dx,y,dy,t),ff:xsqrt(1-y^2)+ysqrt(1-x^2),t1:diff(ff,x)dx+diff(ff,y)dy,t2:(sqrt((1-x^2)(1-y^2))
-xy)*(dx/sqrt(1-x^2)+dy/sqrt(1-y^2)),disp(["t1"=t1,"t2"=t2]),t:radcan(t1-t2),disp(["t"=t]) );
Without restarting maxima and it always gives t=0 in that case. It seems in this case the
kill(ff,x,dx,y,dy,t) should give the same as restarting maxima but it doesn't . Why ?
What does it do on someone eleses computer ? And do you get inconsistent results doing exactly the same thing over and over again ?
Just curious and irrelevant to the bug, but do you really type in huge long lines into maxima? I find them really hard to read and therefore hard to figure what what is the setup and what is the bug. Hence that discourages me from looking at the issue.
The fact that kill(all) doesn't remove stuff from the facts database feels counterintuitive to me, as well. But perhaps it is logical as you can do a assume(U>0); without ever defining U (and therefore put U into the scope of the kill(all);.
what do u mean huge long lines exactly or do you mean should do a carriage return after fewer
characters and have more shorter single lines ?