| Commit | Date | |
|---|---|---|
|
[r18421]
by
vsp_nagel
renamed "endActivity/LegAndAssumeControl" into "endActivity/LegAndComputeNextState", since this is what this does now. pulled back a number of agentCounter.incLiving etc. into the QSim. This necessitated a new agent method, "abort()". Not very beautiful for an agent-based approach; it should reach a safe state rather than explode. But the physical behavior is the same as before. |
2012-02-14 22:04:08 | Tree |
|
[r18420]
by
vsp_nagel
renamed "endActivity/LegAndAssumeControl" into "endActivity/LegAndComputeNextState", since this is what this does now. pulled back a number of agentCounter.incLiving etc. into the QSim. This necessitated a new agent method, "abort()". Not very beautiful for an agent-based approach; it should reach a safe state rather than explode. But the physical behavior is the same as before. |
2012-02-14 22:03:39 | Tree |
|
[r18419]
by
mrieser
change the way how maxspeed attributes are interpreted: Now, always use the sepeed in the maxspeed attribute as freespeed. Before, it was only used if it was less than the (estimated?) default freespeed. Fixes #173. |
2012-02-14 20:47:56 | Tree |
| 2012-02-14 20:46:08 | Tree | |
|
[r18417]
by
vsp_nagel
|
2012-02-14 19:07:50 | Tree |
|
[r18416]
by
vsp_nagel
|
2012-02-14 18:59:09 | Tree |
|
[r18415]
by
vsp_nagel
making the QNetworkFactory settable. No reason to have a factory if you cannot set it (I think). Not very beautiful (contains the ignoble null check since I cannot first sort out the configuration and then call the correct |
2012-02-14 18:58:52 | Tree |
|
[r18414]
by
yu_vsp
|
2012-02-14 15:12:07 | Tree |
|
[r18413]
by
vsp_nagel
added a config option to make "PlanSelectorForRemoval" configurable. This is not well tested, and there is also no regression test (I don't know how to write one that makes sense). I decided to put it in anyways since this keeps coming up, and after I looked into the code how to implement this I thought that I could as well go ahead. This way, we might be able to give it to a student to try it out. |
2012-02-14 14:46:14 | Tree |
|
[r18412]
by
vsp_nagel
added a config option to make "PlanSelectorForRemoval" configurable. This is not well tested, and there is also no regression test (I don't know how to write one that makes sense). I decided to put it in anyways since this keeps coming up, and after I looked into the code how to implement this I thought that I could as well go ahead. This way, we might be able to give it to a student to try it out. |
2012-02-14 14:46:07 | Tree |