From: Darren D. <dd...@co...> - 2007-07-12 21:31:59
|
On Thursday 12 July 2007 05:11:31 pm Carl Worth wrote: > On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:31:19 -1000, Eric Firing wrote: > > if only cairo would make eps files > > Isn't EPS a trivially change compared to PS? Something like a modified > header and the addition of bounding-box information? The following is listed in the Encapsulated Postscript File Format=20 Specification, =20 http://partners.adobe.com/public/developer/en/ps/5002.EPSF_Spec.pdf: "There are some PostScript language operators plus statusdict and userdict= =20 operators that are intended for system-level jobs or page descriptions that= =20 are not appropriate in an EPS =EF=AC=81le. In addition to all operators in = statusdict=20 and the operators in userdict for establishing an imageable area, the=20 following operators must not be used in an EPS =EF=AC=81le: banddevice exitserver initmatrix setshared clear framedevice quit startjob cleardictstack grestoreall renderbands copypage initclip setglobal erasepage initgraphics setpagedevice If used properly, the following operators are allowed in an EPS =EF=AC=81le= =2E However,=20 use of any of these must comply with the rules in Appendix I of the=20 PostScript Language Reference Manual, Second Edition. Improper use can caus= e=20 unpredictable results. nulldevice sethalftone setscreen unde=EF=AC=81nef= ont setgstate setmatrix settransfer " |