From: John H. <jd...@gm...> - 2007-07-10 17:18:37
|
On 7/10/07, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > The comparison is just over the PDF files, old way (Truetype embedding) > vs. new way (Type 3 subsetting). > The ratios are different because I chose to highlight the examples that > are quite "texty". That wasn't a deliberate attempt to mislead, it's > just because this change is related to fonts. Most of the other > examples use a single font, and the plotting content itself dominates > file size. This must be dominated by some weird outliers. I'm seeing great results with the canonical "simple_plot" johnh@flag:examples> python simple_plot.py -dPS johnh@flag:examples> mv simple_plot.ps new.ps johnh@flag:examples> PYTHONPATH=/my/old/site-packages python simple_plot.py -dPS johnh@flag:examples> mv simple_plot.ps old.ps johnh@flag:examples> ls -l old.ps new.ps -rw-r--r-- 1 johnh research 19352 Jul 10 12:11 new.ps -rw-r--r-- 1 johnh research 144227 Jul 10 12:11 old.ps Though for some reason my 90.1 install is picking up Vera Serif and my svn install is picking up Vera Sans., which is mysterious but unrelated to your work In any case, excellent work! JDH |