From: Michael D. <md...@st...> - 2007-07-03 19:37:37
|
Eric Firing wrote: > > I just committed a change to the output formatting of memleak_gui so > that if you redirect it to a file, that file can be loaded with > pylab.load() in case you want to plot the columns. (At least this is > true if you don't use the -c option.) > Great. Sorry for stomping on that ;) > Yesterday, before your commits, I compared memleak_gui with stock > Python 2.4 versus stock 2.5 (both from ubuntu feisty) and found very > little difference in the OS memory numbers. Are they still increasing linearly? I'm still seeing some mystery leaks with Gtk, Qt4 and (much smaller) on Tk. Qt and Wx seem fine here. Unfortunately Qt4 crashes valgrind, so it's not of much use. I'm curious whether your results match that. I'm not terribly surprised that 2.4 isn't different from 2.5, since the case in which entire memory pools are freed in 2.5 is probably hard to trigger. Cheers, Mike |