From: Carl D. K. <cmk...@gm...> - 2004-10-29 14:59:37
|
Dear John > ... > Perhaps others can give input here about what would be the best way to > proceed. My inclination is to use the TeX names like \"a where > possible, but by all means add them if you have them - getting the > codes is the relatively tedious part, providing the proper interface > to them can be worked out later. It may require some changes to the > parser to support \"a and friends, but this is no problem. > I will take that script (and use the output of the ttx fonttool as well) to estimate the glyph ids for each latex symbol. This will take a week or so. If it is not possible to reach the charmap values by get_charmap for the belleek fonts one could use an additional dict with the charmaps values. > Now, on to the "mostly working" part of the font_table script, which > is why I CCd Paul on this email. The font_table script is working on > the um*.ttf fonts but failing on the bl*.ttf fonts. The reason it is > failing is that FT2Font::get_charmap is returning an empty dict. > These fonts are not empty, eg ft2font reports 1 face, 2 charmaps, and > 124 glyphs for blsy.ttf, but get_charmap is returning empty, because > the call to > > FT_ULong code = FT_Get_First_Char(face, &index); > > is returning 0 for code and index. > > Any ideas? > > JDH > Maybe because this fonts use charmaps values beyond 0x20: <cmap_format_4 platformID="3" platEncID="0" version="0"> <map code="0x1" name="Delta"/><!-- <control> --> <map code="0x2" name="Theta"/><!-- <control> --> <map code="0x3" name="Lambda"/><!-- <control> --> A cmap value for 0x0 is missing: <map code="0x0" name=".null"/> (um fonts) But this is just a wild guess. Regards Carl -- Geschenkt: 3 Monate GMX ProMail + 3 Top-Spielfilme auf DVD ++ Jetzt kostenlos testen http://www.gmx.net/de/go/mail ++ |