From: Fernando P. <fp...@co...> - 2004-05-07 04:09:19
|
Travis Oliphant wrote: > Todd Pitts from Sandia asked me the following question. > > >>I have one final question about python on windows. It seems >>that the non-interactive scripting works well enough. However, I have >>not found a single interactive interpreter that I could recommend to >>members of my group without serious reservations. >> >>I have tried IPython, >>PyCrust (various), IDLE, Using it from within emacs (not cygwin emacs, >>just emacs under windows), PythonWin, etc. They all have serious >>problems when it comes to usability. Most don't have tab completion at >>all. Most, (emacs included) don't work with any plotting package. I >>have tried gist from scipy and matplotlib (doesn't work with anything >>except straight scripting). >> >>Is python really this unusable for >>interactive data exploration and modeling under Windows? As the ipython (http://ipython.scipy.org) author I'm obviously biased, but Windows users seem fairly happy with it. Using Gary Bishop's extensions, it is possible (it should basically work out of the box, though I don't know because I don't use Windows) to get readline and coloring support under a normal (non-cygwin) command shell. Gary's tools are at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/uncpythontools I also imagine that using ipython within emacs as your python shell (which requires a special python-mode.el and ipython.el, available at http://ipython.scipy.org/dist/ipython-emacs-0.3.tgz) must be an option under Windows. I've only used them under Linux, but since this is just regular Emacs lisp, I imagine it should be platform-independent. I hope this helps. Regards, Fernando. |