From: John H. <jdh...@ac...> - 2003-11-09 12:52:49
|
>>>>> "Charles" == Charles <ct...@cs...> writes: Charles> John, I'd second the request for direct EPS. Sometimes Charles> you can get away without the bounding box, but not Charles> always. I've been using ps2epsi to convert my matplot .ps Charles> files into .eps files (.epsi is .eps with a preview, but Charles> I don't need the preview). It does a good job of finding Charles> bounding boxes. That's very important for running Charles> epstopdf on the images. That gives me pdf images so I can Charles> run pdflatex and generate a native PDF file from my Charles> LaTeX. I'll see if I can get EPS into the ps backend in the near future. As far as I know, it should just be a matter of adding a bounding box. Note that you don't need to first convert your images to PDF to generate PDF from LaTeX (though a PDF backend is on the TODO list). I routinely generate PDF documents from LaTeX src with *.ps inputs as follows # With recent version of gv (7.x or later) do > dvips -Pcmz -Pamz -G1 -Ppdf -o final3.ps final3.dvi > ps2pdf final3.ps This will generate high quality PDF w/o the blurry appearance in acroread that you sometimes see with PDF generated by LaTeX. Hope this helps! John Hunter |