From: Darren D. <dd...@co...> - 2005-04-04 17:19:02
|
On Monday 04 April 2005 12:09 pm, John Hunter wrote: > > I agree ticks (and text in general) are too expensive. In my > experience, this is usually only starts a problem in animated plots > (do you have another use case in mind?). I think we might be able to > work around this particular problem by supporting the drawing of only > a subset of the artists in the scene. [...] > > > I'm not opposed to a redesign of the Tick drawing if there are > appreciable gains to be had, but my guess is we may get more bang for > the buck in special casing the typical text layout (angle=0.0, no > mathtext, no unicode) and handling dynamic updates more intelligently. Data acquisition is a good example of where a new tick protocol would be useful. Supposing the user wants a plot in their gui that autoscales after the addition of each new point (which is not uncommon), the ticks would need to render as quickly as possible. Everytime somebody I work with complains about the LabView program from National Instruments, I think about how nice it would be to do data acquisition with Python. I had hoped that Taco would mature into a solid library for interfacing with scientific instruments, but the project doesnt seem very active, judging by their webpage http://www.esrf.fr/taco/. -- Darren |