From: Fernando P. <Fer...@co...> - 2005-01-24 22:49:09
|
Baptiste Carvello wrote: > Hello, > > I'm just making a proposal. As long as the documentation points to > IPython for interactive use, you can't say we have a perfect solution on > our own :-) (this is not meant to criticize your work on IPython, it's > just that I feel more confortable with the usual python interface) > > I know the patch is intrusive, though maybe not as much as it looks > (everything except protect_mutex.py is pretty trivial). I didn't > expected it to be accepted right away, I see it more as a contribution > to the whole gui thread discution. > > As for gui_thread, I looked at it last year, I just remember I didn't > like that code that much. Maybe I should get another look... I actually didn't have ipython in mind at all in my comment. I agree that a generic, shell-independent solution is a good thing to have. I just think that gui_thread provides a cleaner approach (if not clean code :) to the overall problem. gui_thread is messy, but it allows general (meaning, beyond matplotlib) access to gui elements from a command line. I quickly tested it with matplotlib and it crashed, so there's work to be done... I was just trying to point out an alternate direction, ultimately if John is happy with this approach, it's his call (he gets to maintain it :) Cheers, f |