|
From: Perry G. <pe...@st...> - 2005-01-10 03:17:02
|
Fernando Perez wrote: > While pylab's mission is indeed is matlab compatibility, you > already point out > that this is not an 'at all costs' objective. This is one case > where I really > think that breaking compatibility with the base python language > is a too high > price to pay. I'm having a hard time justifying my position in a clear > manner, but I have a strong 'gut feeling' about it. I'll try to > provide some > rational points, though: > [...] My 2 cents is that I think Fernando is right on this issue. I'd rather go with a solution that causes temporary pain for matlab users rather than one that causes lingering, long-term irritations. Perry |