From: Perry G. <pe...@st...> - 2004-11-01 21:39:29
|
On Oct 28, 2004, at 4:58 PM, Robert Kern wrote: > gary ruben wrote: >> True, I didn't pay much attention to licencing. In light of it >> though, here >> are a couple more links to a couple of gentlemen who may be worth >> grovelling to should the need arise. No specific licencing is >> mentioned. >> <http://mahi.ucsd.edu/parker/Software/> > > Actually, having seen this code and the gist code, I'd recommend > waiting for the gist-derived prototype. > > To muddy the waters a bit, the gist contouring algorithm looks to my > eye like Paul Bourke's CONREC algorithm, which may or may not be > patented. > Which gist contouring routine are you referring to? It appears to use two separate implementations for different contour functions. We are using the code in gcntr.c. If that is based on Bourke's routine, there shouldn't be a problem. None of the code that uses it makes any reference to a patent; there appear to be a number of other implementations, none of which appear to have been challenged. As far as patent rights go, aren't they only good for 17 years? It was published in July 1987 (though I suppose it may derive from when it was granted, not published). Then there is copyright, but that doesn't guard against reimplementation so long as code isn't copied (But I am not a lawy...). Perry |